Impacts of being scolded at workplace on psychological distress among Japanese employees: a cross-sectional study

Background: While scolding is an often problematic form of workplace communication in Japan, little research exists regarding its impact on employees' mental health. Objectives: This study investigated the associations between being scolded at work and psychological distress. Methods: Data from the Employee Cohort Study during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan (E-COCO-J) surveys obtained in September 2023 (14th wave) were used. Psychological distress was measured using the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6), with a cutoff of 13 points. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted by adjusting demographic factors, psychiatric treatment history, and workplace factors. Results: A total of 758 participants were included in the analysis. Among the participants, 159 individuals (21%) reported having been scolded at least one time in the past month, and 116 individuals (15.3%) had a K6 score of 13 or higher. Compared to those who were not scolded, being scolded less than 1 day a week (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07–3.11) and about more than 1 day a week (AOR 2.42; 95% CI, 1.23–4.76) showed significant associations with high psychological distress. Conclusion: This study suggested that being scolded has a negative impact on employees' mental health. Further study is needed to investigate effective methods of delivering constructive negative feedback rather than resorting to scolding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental and Occupational Health Practice
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1539/eohp.2025-0009
Primary Topic
Emotional Labor in Professions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impacts of being scolded at workplace on psychological distress among Japanese employees: a cross-sectional study

Norito Kawakami, Natsu Sasaki, Kanami Tsuno, Kohei Mase et al.
Environmental and Occupational Health Practice
Emotional Labor in Professions
article

Impacts of being scolded at workplace on psychological distress among Japanese employees: a cross-sectional study

Norito Kawakami, Natsu Sasaki, Kanami Tsuno, Kohei Mase, Kotaro Imamura, Daisuke Nishi, Reiko Kuroda
article en

Abstract

Background: While scolding is an often problematic form of workplace communication in Japan, little research exists regarding its impact on employees' mental health. Objectives: This study investigated the associations between being scolded at work and psychological distress. Methods: Data from the Employee Cohort Study during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan (E-COCO-J) surveys obtained in September 2023 (14th wave) were used. Psychological distress was measured using the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6), with a cutoff of 13 points. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted by adjusting demographic factors, psychiatric treatment history, and workplace factors. Results: A total of 758 participants were included in the analysis. Among the participants, 159 individuals (21%) reported having been scolded at least one time in the past month, and 116 individuals (15.3%) had a K6 score of 13 or higher. Compared to those who were not scolded, being scolded less than 1 day a week (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07–3.11) and about more than 1 day a week (AOR 2.42; 95% CI, 1.23–4.76) showed significant associations with high psychological distress. Conclusion: This study suggested that being scolded has a negative impact on employees' mental health. Further study is needed to investigate effective methods of delivering constructive negative feedback rather than resorting to scolding.

Environmental and Occupational Health Practice
Kanagawa University of Human Services (JP), The University of Tokyo (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Emotional Labor in Professions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.