Barriers to using physical assessment skills in clinical practices among nursing students: a cross-sectional study

Purpose To explore the barriers to physical assessment skills among nursing students at Northern Border University. Methods A descriptive cross-sectional study with a sample size of 260 participants was conducted. A self-administered online questionnaire comprising demographic data for nursing students and barriers to physical assessment skills was used. The survey used a five-point Likert scale with responses ranging from “strongly disagree” to “strongly agree” and scores from 1 to 5 points. Results Findings revealed that 68.5% were aged 20–29, 67.7% were female, and 75.8% were single. Most were in their third year (56.5%) and had a GPA above 3.5 (80.8%). Many believe physical assessment is mainly a physician’s role. The most prominent barriers reported by respondents included reliance on technology, lack of time, and ward culture. Females reported more barriers, mainly due to technology reliance and low confidence ( p < 0.05). Regular program students faced more challenges than those in bridging programs ( p < 0.05) Program type, age, and gender significantly predicted perceived barriers ( p < 0.05). Conclusion The current study findings indicate significant barriers related to gender, age, and program type, with female students reporting greater challenges. The research emphasizes the need for targeted educational interventions, such as structured simulation and clinical mentorship, to enhance nursing students’ competence in physical assessments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Medicine
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1799059
Primary Topic
Nursing education and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Barriers to using physical assessment skills in clinical practices among nursing students: a cross-sectional study

Fatma Abdou Eltaib, Ibrahim Naif Alenezi, Taghreed Hussien Aboelola, Ohoud Naif Aldughmi et al.
Frontiers in Medicine
Nursing education and management
article

Barriers to using physical assessment skills in clinical practices among nursing students: a cross-sectional study

Fatma Abdou Eltaib, Ibrahim Naif Alenezi, Taghreed Hussien Aboelola, Ohoud Naif Aldughmi, Fathia Ahmed Mersal, Lobna Mohamed Mohamed Abu Negm
article en

Abstract

Purpose To explore the barriers to physical assessment skills among nursing students at Northern Border University. Methods A descriptive cross-sectional study with a sample size of 260 participants was conducted. A self-administered online questionnaire comprising demographic data for nursing students and barriers to physical assessment skills was used. The survey used a five-point Likert scale with responses ranging from “strongly disagree” to “strongly agree” and scores from 1 to 5 points. Results Findings revealed that 68.5% were aged 20–29, 67.7% were female, and 75.8% were single. Most were in their third year (56.5%) and had a GPA above 3.5 (80.8%). Many believe physical assessment is mainly a physician’s role. The most prominent barriers reported by respondents included reliance on technology, lack of time, and ward culture. Females reported more barriers, mainly due to technology reliance and low confidence ( p < 0.05). Regular program students faced more challenges than those in bridging programs ( p < 0.05) Program type, age, and gender significantly predicted perceived barriers ( p < 0.05). Conclusion The current study findings indicate significant barriers related to gender, age, and program type, with female students reporting greater challenges. The research emphasizes the need for targeted educational interventions, such as structured simulation and clinical mentorship, to enhance nursing students’ competence in physical assessments.

Frontiers in MedicineVol. 13
Northern Border University (SA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Nursing education and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.