A Study on the Rationalization of the Notification System for Small-Scale Building Demolition Works

Background and objective: Demolition work in Korea has historically been managed under fragmented regulations, resulting in overlapping administrative procedures and inadequate safety controls. While the Building Management Act was enacted and revised to enhance demolition safety following major collapse accidents, practical limitations persist, especially for small-scale demolition projects. Excessive administrative burdens and limited effectiveness of expert reviews continue to be reported. This study aims to evaluate the efficiency of Korea's demolition permit and notification system and to propose improvement measures that balance safety and administrative efficiency.Methods: A mixed research approach was adopted, including institutional analysis, international comparisons, surveys, and expert interviews. Demolition approval systems in the United States, Japan, and the European Union were reviewed. In addition, surveys and interviews were conducted with 204 stakeholders, including architects, professional engineers, demolition contractors, and public officials. The analysis focused on demolition plan preparation costs, administrative procedures, reviewer qualifications, and the appropriateness of current floor area-based criteria.Results: The findings show that the current system imposes disproportionate administrative and financial burdens on small-scale, low-risk demolition projects. Over 60% of respondents indicated that the notification system requires relaxation, and more than half considered the cost of preparing demolition plans excessively. The study also revealed that floor area-based criteria alone are insufficient to reflect demolition risk adequately, and that reviews conducted by a single professional group lack sufficient technical depth.Conclusion: This study proposes a risk-based improvement framework that incorporates structural type, building use, and surrounding conditions alongside revised floor area thresholds. Key recommendations include relaxing review requirements for small-scale demolition works, raising permit thresholds, standardizing demolition plan templates, and adopting a multidisciplinary review system. These measures are anticipated to reduce administrative inefficiencies while strengthening demolition safety management.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of people, plants, and environment
Published
2026-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11628/ksppe.2026.29.1.17
Primary Topic
Construction Engineering and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Study on the Rationalization of the Notification System for Small-Scale Building Demolition Works

Chang-Hak Kim
Journal of people, plants, and environment
Construction Engineering and Safety
article

A Study on the Rationalization of the Notification System for Small-Scale Building Demolition Works

Chang-Hak Kim
article en

Abstract

Background and objective: Demolition work in Korea has historically been managed under fragmented regulations, resulting in overlapping administrative procedures and inadequate safety controls. While the Building Management Act was enacted and revised to enhance demolition safety following major collapse accidents, practical limitations persist, especially for small-scale demolition projects. Excessive administrative burdens and limited effectiveness of expert reviews continue to be reported. This study aims to evaluate the efficiency of Korea's demolition permit and notification system and to propose improvement measures that balance safety and administrative efficiency.Methods: A mixed research approach was adopted, including institutional analysis, international comparisons, surveys, and expert interviews. Demolition approval systems in the United States, Japan, and the European Union were reviewed. In addition, surveys and interviews were conducted with 204 stakeholders, including architects, professional engineers, demolition contractors, and public officials. The analysis focused on demolition plan preparation costs, administrative procedures, reviewer qualifications, and the appropriateness of current floor area-based criteria.Results: The findings show that the current system imposes disproportionate administrative and financial burdens on small-scale, low-risk demolition projects. Over 60% of respondents indicated that the notification system requires relaxation, and more than half considered the cost of preparing demolition plans excessively. The study also revealed that floor area-based criteria alone are insufficient to reflect demolition risk adequately, and that reviews conducted by a single professional group lack sufficient technical depth.Conclusion: This study proposes a risk-based improvement framework that incorporates structural type, building use, and surrounding conditions alongside revised floor area thresholds. Key recommendations include relaxing review requirements for small-scale demolition works, raising permit thresholds, standardizing demolition plan templates, and adopting a multidisciplinary review system. These measures are anticipated to reduce administrative inefficiencies while strengthening demolition safety management.

Journal of people, plants, and environmentVol. 29(1)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Construction Engineering and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Study on the Rationalization of the Notification System for Small-Scale Building Demolition Works — Chang-Hak Kim · Journal of people, plants, and environment (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS