Testing the performance of S-curves for language change

Abstract This article investigates the effectiveness of sigmoid trajectories (S-curves) for statistically modelling language change. In diachronic linguistics, it is customary to fit a sigmoid regression line through data, on the assumption that such a curve fits the ideal language change. A coefficient with an associated p-value significantly different from zero is taken as evidence for the presence of a change. Here, we take the inverse perspective: given a known change, how well can the S-curve predict the actual data? We look at 15 well-known changes in Late Modern Dutch, in a genre-balanced corpus. For each change we built four different models: one model based on all the data and three partly blinded models, where either the beginning, middle or end of the S-curve is omitted. We check how well the S-curve can predict or reconstruct the unknown data, i.e. the blinded parts of the S-curve. We investigate in which cases (the type of change, the part of the data that is omitted, etc.) it is easier or harder to reconstruct the missing data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diachronica
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.23065.nij
Primary Topic
Authorship Attribution and Profiling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Testing the performance of S-curves for language change

Julie Nijs, Freek Van de Velde
Diachronica
Authorship Attribution and Profiling
article

Testing the performance of S-curves for language change

Julie Nijs, Freek Van de Velde
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article investigates the effectiveness of sigmoid trajectories (S-curves) for statistically modelling language change. In diachronic linguistics, it is customary to fit a sigmoid regression line through data, on the assumption that such a curve fits the ideal language change. A coefficient with an associated p-value significantly different from zero is taken as evidence for the presence of a change. Here, we take the inverse perspective: given a known change, how well can the S-curve predict the actual data? We look at 15 well-known changes in Late Modern Dutch, in a genre-balanced corpus. For each change we built four different models: one model based on all the data and three partly blinded models, where either the beginning, middle or end of the S-curve is omitted. We check how well the S-curve can predict or reconstruct the unknown data, i.e. the blinded parts of the S-curve. We investigate in which cases (the type of change, the part of the data that is omitted, etc.) it is easier or harder to reconstruct the missing data.

Diachronica
KU Leuven (BE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Authorship Attribution and Profiling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Testing the performance of S-curves for language change — Julie Nijs, Freek Van de Velde · Diachronica (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS