Path planning for manipulators based on the planar constraint RRT* algorithm

Path planning is crucial for automatic measurement to ensure a collision-free process for manipulators. However, the more complex the measurement environment, the more complex the path planning scheme is often required in order to meet the above requirements. To overcome this problem, a planar constraint RRT* method (PC-RRT*) is proposed to limit nodes to a specific plane, reduce the blindness of RRT*, and smooth paths. The measurement space model is built according to the position of the manipulator, the obstacle environment, the starting point, and the ending point. A set of equiangular interval collinear planes is built by utilizing the starting and ending line as the central axis. A local path on each plane is planned by extended rapidly exploring random tree strategy. By optimizing the planned local path set, the high-quality measurement path will be solved. Both numerical simulation and experimental analysis are carried out to verify the effectiveness of the PC-RRT* method. The experimental results show that the average path lengths (APL) are 216.03 mm for PC-RRT*, 346.83 mm for RRT, 241.93 mm for RRT*, and 383.6 mm for Q-learning (QL), the average number of nodes is 9.5 for PC-RRT*, 11.12 for RRT, 11.6 for RRT*, and 18.92 for QL. The suggested PC-RRT* has an 37.71% improvement for APL and 14.57% improvement for path nodes compared to the RRT algorithm. PC-RRT* has a 10.71% improvement for APL and 18.1% improvement for path nodes compared to the RRT* algorithm. Additionally, PC-RRT* achieves a 43.68% improvement for APL and a 49.79% improvement for path nodes compared to the QL algorithm. In all, the PC-RRT* method is superior to other traditional methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-44581-7
Primary Topic
Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Path planning for manipulators based on the planar constraint RRT* algorithm

Zai Luo, Wensong Jiang, Yan Wang, Minyue Li et al.
Scientific Reports
Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
article

Path planning for manipulators based on the planar constraint RRT* algorithm

Zai Luo, Wensong Jiang, Yan Wang, Minyue Li, Li Yang
article en

Abstract

Path planning is crucial for automatic measurement to ensure a collision-free process for manipulators. However, the more complex the measurement environment, the more complex the path planning scheme is often required in order to meet the above requirements. To overcome this problem, a planar constraint RRT* method (PC-RRT*) is proposed to limit nodes to a specific plane, reduce the blindness of RRT*, and smooth paths. The measurement space model is built according to the position of the manipulator, the obstacle environment, the starting point, and the ending point. A set of equiangular interval collinear planes is built by utilizing the starting and ending line as the central axis. A local path on each plane is planned by extended rapidly exploring random tree strategy. By optimizing the planned local path set, the high-quality measurement path will be solved. Both numerical simulation and experimental analysis are carried out to verify the effectiveness of the PC-RRT* method. The experimental results show that the average path lengths (APL) are 216.03 mm for PC-RRT*, 346.83 mm for RRT, 241.93 mm for RRT*, and 383.6 mm for Q-learning (QL), the average number of nodes is 9.5 for PC-RRT*, 11.12 for RRT, 11.6 for RRT*, and 18.92 for QL. The suggested PC-RRT* has an 37.71% improvement for APL and 14.57% improvement for path nodes compared to the RRT algorithm. PC-RRT* has a 10.71% improvement for APL and 18.1% improvement for path nodes compared to the RRT* algorithm. Additionally, PC-RRT* achieves a 43.68% improvement for APL and a 49.79% improvement for path nodes compared to the QL algorithm. In all, the PC-RRT* method is superior to other traditional methods.

Scientific Reports
China Jiliang University (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.