Psychological Distress and Coping Strategies Among South Africans During COVID-19 Lockdowns: Findings from an Online Survey

Abstract This study explores psychological distress and coping strategies among South African adults (median age of 38; IQR = 28–50) during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown regulations through a rapid online survey ( N = 851). More than half (55.23%) of the participants reported psychological distress, namely high levels of anxiety and depression, with almost half of this group (47.02%) at risk of severe psychological disorder. Binary logistic regression indicated that participants who were younger, self-identified as female, self-reported recent cold/flu symptoms, current tobacco use, and past-year drug use were significantly more likely to report psychological distress. Conversely, well-being, resilience, and healthy coping were associated with no psychological distress. Multivariate analysis revealed that participants’ well-being was a strong predictor of whether they experienced distress (OR = 0.06, 95% CI = 0.01–0.21). These findings underscore the importance of promoting mental well-being and resilience in countries with an existing mental health service gap to mitigate the psychological impact of public health crises. Developing proactive mental health strategies and planning for emergency response planning can assist in supporting populations during future pandemics or similar disruptions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-026-01648-w
Primary Topic
COVID-19 and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychological Distress and Coping Strategies Among South Africans During COVID-19 Lockdowns: Findings from an Online Survey

Marieke Theron, T. Carney, Mukhetwa Londani, Nadine Harker
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
COVID-19 and Mental Health
article

Psychological Distress and Coping Strategies Among South Africans During COVID-19 Lockdowns: Findings from an Online Survey

Marieke Theron, T. Carney, Mukhetwa Londani, Nadine Harker
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study explores psychological distress and coping strategies among South African adults (median age of 38; IQR = 28–50) during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown regulations through a rapid online survey ( N = 851). More than half (55.23%) of the participants reported psychological distress, namely high levels of anxiety and depression, with almost half of this group (47.02%) at risk of severe psychological disorder. Binary logistic regression indicated that participants who were younger, self-identified as female, self-reported recent cold/flu symptoms, current tobacco use, and past-year drug use were significantly more likely to report psychological distress. Conversely, well-being, resilience, and healthy coping were associated with no psychological distress. Multivariate analysis revealed that participants’ well-being was a strong predictor of whether they experienced distress (OR = 0.06, 95% CI = 0.01–0.21). These findings underscore the importance of promoting mental well-being and resilience in countries with an existing mental health service gap to mitigate the psychological impact of public health crises. Developing proactive mental health strategies and planning for emergency response planning can assist in supporting populations during future pandemics or similar disruptions.

International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
South African Medical Research Council (ZA), Tshwane University of Technology (ZA), University of Cape Town (ZA), University of Johannesburg (ZA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
COVID-19 and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.