<i>In vitro</i> fertilization outcomes in young women and their association with male and female infertility aetiology

Infertility aetiology has been shown to be related to reproductive outcomes in the wide reproductive age range. The aim of this study was to examine young women <i>in vitro</i> fertilization (IVF) cycle outcomes according to age and infertility cause. This retrospective cohort study was comprised of 305 couples with a female partner aged 17-25 years with either male or female infertility that underwent a fresh IVF cycle between 2003 and 2020. Comparison according to age groups 17-22 years (<i>n</i> = 117) and 23-25 years (<i>n</i> = 188) showed similar outcomes, except for higher rates of 3 pronuclei (PN) embryos in the younger group. However, allocation to groups by infertility aetiology - male factor (MF) (<i>n</i> = 241) vs. female factor (FF) (<i>n</i> = 64) demonstrated lower fertilization rate in the FF vs. MF group (58% vs. 63%, <i>p</i> = 0.049) and higher percent of 1PN and 3PN embryos (0.7% vs. 0.2% and 0.7% vs. 0.1%, <i>p</i> < 0.001 for both). Chemical pregnancy and live-birth rate were significantly higher in the MF vs. FF group (48.9% vs. 29.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.02 and 41.9% vs. 11.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.038). The only parameter associated with live birth rate in a logistic regression analysis was male infertility aetiology (<i>OR</i> = 2.17, <i>p</i> = 0.038). Young couples undergoing IVF cycles due to female factor infertility have poorer reproductive outcomes compared to male factor-related infertility and higher rates of 1PN and 3PN embryos.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zygote
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0967199426100306
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In vitro fertilization outcomes in young women and their association with male and female infertility aetiology

Tal Imbar, Gilad Karavani, Hiila Bauch, Natali Schachter-Safrai et al.
Zygote
Reproductive Health and Technologies
article

In vitro fertilization outcomes in young women and their association with male and female infertility aetiology

Tal Imbar, Gilad Karavani, Hiila Bauch, Natali Schachter-Safrai, Assaf Ban-Meir
article en

Abstract

Infertility aetiology has been shown to be related to reproductive outcomes in the wide reproductive age range. The aim of this study was to examine young women <i>in vitro</i> fertilization (IVF) cycle outcomes according to age and infertility cause. This retrospective cohort study was comprised of 305 couples with a female partner aged 17-25 years with either male or female infertility that underwent a fresh IVF cycle between 2003 and 2020. Comparison according to age groups 17-22 years (<i>n</i> = 117) and 23-25 years (<i>n</i> = 188) showed similar outcomes, except for higher rates of 3 pronuclei (PN) embryos in the younger group. However, allocation to groups by infertility aetiology - male factor (MF) (<i>n</i> = 241) vs. female factor (FF) (<i>n</i> = 64) demonstrated lower fertilization rate in the FF vs. MF group (58% vs. 63%, <i>p</i> = 0.049) and higher percent of 1PN and 3PN embryos (0.7% vs. 0.2% and 0.7% vs. 0.1%, <i>p</i> < 0.001 for both). Chemical pregnancy and live-birth rate were significantly higher in the MF vs. FF group (48.9% vs. 29.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.02 and 41.9% vs. 11.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.038). The only parameter associated with live birth rate in a logistic regression analysis was male infertility aetiology (<i>OR</i> = 2.17, <i>p</i> = 0.038). Young couples undergoing IVF cycles due to female factor infertility have poorer reproductive outcomes compared to male factor-related infertility and higher rates of 1PN and 3PN embryos.

Zygote
Hadassah Medical Center (IL), Rambam Health Care Campus (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Reproductive Health and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.