Professional perspectives on PN among registered dietitians in Saudi Arabia: a mixed-methods assessment

Background The clinical implementation of personalized nutrition (PN) remains limited, despite growing interest. Healthcare professionals’ readiness for adoption must be better understood. Objective The aim of this study is to explore registered dietitians’ perceptions, attitudes, and readiness regarding PN and multi-omics approaches in Saudi Arabia. Method A mixed-methods survey of 88 registered dietitians in Saudi Arabia provided quantitative and qualitative data on personalized nutrition technology (PNT) adoption patterns and barriers, analysed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to identify implementation barriers and facilitators. Results PNT adoption was low (16%). Work experience, but not education level, had a relatively greater correlation with perceived usefulness of PNT ( r = 0.280, p = 0.007). Genomics, metabolomics, and microbiome testing demonstrated strong correlations with PNT usefulness ( r = 0.321–0.571, p ≤ 0.004). Qualitative findings identified knowledge gaps as the primary challenge and emphasized education as the key facilitator. Conclusion While Saudi dietitians have positive attitudes toward PN, they face significant implementation barriers at both an organizational and educational levels. For PN integration to be achieved within the Kingdom’s healthcare system, policy, academic, and institutional interventions are required to enhance organizational support, professional training gaps, and interprofessional collaboration frameworks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Nutrition
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2026.1695919
Primary Topic
Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Professional perspectives on PN among registered dietitians in Saudi Arabia: a mixed-methods assessment

Yasmin Algindan, Shabir Ahmad, Hoda AboAlsamh
Frontiers in Nutrition
Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
article

Professional perspectives on PN among registered dietitians in Saudi Arabia: a mixed-methods assessment

Yasmin Algindan, Shabir Ahmad, Hoda AboAlsamh
article en

Abstract

Background The clinical implementation of personalized nutrition (PN) remains limited, despite growing interest. Healthcare professionals’ readiness for adoption must be better understood. Objective The aim of this study is to explore registered dietitians’ perceptions, attitudes, and readiness regarding PN and multi-omics approaches in Saudi Arabia. Method A mixed-methods survey of 88 registered dietitians in Saudi Arabia provided quantitative and qualitative data on personalized nutrition technology (PNT) adoption patterns and barriers, analysed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to identify implementation barriers and facilitators. Results PNT adoption was low (16%). Work experience, but not education level, had a relatively greater correlation with perceived usefulness of PNT ( r = 0.280, p = 0.007). Genomics, metabolomics, and microbiome testing demonstrated strong correlations with PNT usefulness ( r = 0.321–0.571, p ≤ 0.004). Qualitative findings identified knowledge gaps as the primary challenge and emphasized education as the key facilitator. Conclusion While Saudi dietitians have positive attitudes toward PN, they face significant implementation barriers at both an organizational and educational levels. For PN integration to be achieved within the Kingdom’s healthcare system, policy, academic, and institutional interventions are required to enhance organizational support, professional training gaps, and interprofessional collaboration frameworks.

Frontiers in NutritionVol. 13
Al Yamamah University (SA), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University (SA)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.