From controversy to confusion: A commentary on how Marcus et al.’s (2025) Psychopathic Boldness Scale further muddies the boldness construct.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychological Assessment
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001442
Primary Topic
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From controversy to confusion: A commentary on how Marcus et al.’s (2025) Psychopathic Boldness Scale further muddies the boldness construct.

J. Philip Miller, Mojtaba Elhami Athar, Donald R. Lynam
Psychological Assessment
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
article

From controversy to confusion: A commentary on how Marcus et al.’s (2025) Psychopathic Boldness Scale further muddies the boldness construct.

J. Philip Miller, Mojtaba Elhami Athar, Donald R. Lynam
article en

Abstract

No abstract available for this paper.
Psychological AssessmentVol. 38(4)
University of Georgia (US), Google DeepMind (United Kingdom) (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
DOISourceOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

From controversy to confusion: A commentary on how Marcus et al.’s (2025) Psychopathic Boldness Scale further muddies the boldness construct. — J. Philip Miller, Mojtaba Elhami Athar, et al. · Psychological Assessment (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS