Reliability, validity, and feasibility of a method for assessing sport-specific reactive agility in badminton players

Background Reactive agility is a critical determinant of badminton performance, reflecting an athlete’s ability to rapidly perceive, decide, and execute movement responses under dynamic conditions. However, there is a lack of standardized and sport-specific assessment tools to evaluate this multidimensional skill in badminton. This study aimed to develop and evaluate the reliability, validity, and feasibility of a badminton-specific reactive agility test (B-RAT). Methods Nine technical and three strength coaches assessed the content validity of the B-RAT using a four-point scale. A total of 201 professional athletes (119 male, 82 female) from provincial and national teams participated in the testing. Test-retest reliability was examined in 58 athletes across two sessions separated by seven days. Criterion validity was assessed in 28 single players by correlating B-RAT performance with simulated match outcomes, while construct validity was evaluated by comparing B-RAT results with established change of direction speed (CODS) tests and among athletes of different competition levels. Feasibility was assessed based on experts’ ratings of practicality, clarity, and resource requirements. Results The B-RAT demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.90, CV = 5.82%), strong content validity (S-CVI = 0.93), and correlations with match ranking ( r = 0.65 − 0.76, p < 0.05). In addition, B-RAT was significantly associated with five conventional CODS tests ( r = 0.52 − 0.71, p < 0.01), and effectively differentiated athletes by competition level ( d = 1.39 − 1.67; η 2 = 0.29 − 0.43, p < 0.05). The feasibility score exceeded the required threshold (≥ 35/50). Conclusions The B-RAT is a reliable, valid, and feasible test for assessing sport-specific reactive agility in badminton players. It effectively integrates perceptual-cognitive and motor components, providing a practical and standardized tool for evaluating performance, guiding individualized training, and monitoring agility development in competitive badminton contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PeerJ
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.20972
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reliability, validity, and feasibility of a method for assessing sport-specific reactive agility in badminton players

Jiachi Ye, Jingjie Zhou, Binghong Gao, Rui Cheng
PeerJ
Sports Performance and Training
article

Reliability, validity, and feasibility of a method for assessing sport-specific reactive agility in badminton players

Jiachi Ye, Jingjie Zhou, Binghong Gao, Rui Cheng
article en

Abstract

Background Reactive agility is a critical determinant of badminton performance, reflecting an athlete’s ability to rapidly perceive, decide, and execute movement responses under dynamic conditions. However, there is a lack of standardized and sport-specific assessment tools to evaluate this multidimensional skill in badminton. This study aimed to develop and evaluate the reliability, validity, and feasibility of a badminton-specific reactive agility test (B-RAT). Methods Nine technical and three strength coaches assessed the content validity of the B-RAT using a four-point scale. A total of 201 professional athletes (119 male, 82 female) from provincial and national teams participated in the testing. Test-retest reliability was examined in 58 athletes across two sessions separated by seven days. Criterion validity was assessed in 28 single players by correlating B-RAT performance with simulated match outcomes, while construct validity was evaluated by comparing B-RAT results with established change of direction speed (CODS) tests and among athletes of different competition levels. Feasibility was assessed based on experts’ ratings of practicality, clarity, and resource requirements. Results The B-RAT demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.90, CV = 5.82%), strong content validity (S-CVI = 0.93), and correlations with match ranking ( r = 0.65 − 0.76, p < 0.05). In addition, B-RAT was significantly associated with five conventional CODS tests ( r = 0.52 − 0.71, p < 0.01), and effectively differentiated athletes by competition level ( d = 1.39 − 1.67; η 2 = 0.29 − 0.43, p < 0.05). The feasibility score exceeded the required threshold (≥ 35/50). Conclusions The B-RAT is a reliable, valid, and feasible test for assessing sport-specific reactive agility in badminton players. It effectively integrates perceptual-cognitive and motor components, providing a practical and standardized tool for evaluating performance, guiding individualized training, and monitoring agility development in competitive badminton contexts.

PeerJVol. 14
Shanghai University of Sport (CN), Nanjing Sport Institute (CN), Macao Polytechnic University (MO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.