Understanding Teleoperation in Robotics: A Systematic Review of Device Types and Main Performance

Teleoperation of robotic manipulators has advanced significantly in recent years, serving as a critical solution for high-risk applications in medicine, industry, and space exploration, where direct human intervention is impractical or hazardous. Despite these advances, persistent technical and operational challenges, such as latency-induced instability and limited real-world validation, restrict broader adoption, necessitating a systematic evaluation of emerging technologies and their integrations to bridge the gap between laboratory prototypes and field-deployable systems. To this end, we conducted a Systematic Mapping Study across Scopus, IEEE Xplore, and Web of Science, screening 3,957 records and selecting 339 primary studies from 2019 to mid-2024 for in-depth analysis. The results categorize advancements into eight key groups: exoskeletons, haptic devices, immersive technologies, neural interfaces, motion and biometric sensing systems, direct input and control interfaces, advanced identification and communication systems, and combinations. The findings reveal a pronounced shift toward multimodal hybrids (<italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">e.g</i>., haptic-immersive fusions) that enhance operator precision, situational awareness, and ergonomic usability across domains. However, communication latency remains the predominant barrier, with delays over 200 ms compromising stability and safety irrespective of interface complexity. These findings underscore that while hybrid integrations mitigate isolated limitations, domain-specific tolerances —such as near-zero in medicine versus moderate in industry— demand tailored optimizations for effective deployment. Future research should prioritize rigorous field trials with standardized benchmarks (<italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">e.g</i>., NASA-TLX for workload and FMEA for safety) for combined technologies, alongside the development of 6G-enabled predictive algorithms to preempt latency issues, ensuring scalable, resilient teleoperation in critical scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Access
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2026.3676696
Primary Topic
Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding Teleoperation in Robotics: A Systematic Review of Device Types and Main Performance

Vladimir Riffo, Víctor Ariza, John W. Castro
IEEE Access
Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
article

Understanding Teleoperation in Robotics: A Systematic Review of Device Types and Main Performance

Vladimir Riffo, Víctor Ariza, John W. Castro
article en

Abstract

Teleoperation of robotic manipulators has advanced significantly in recent years, serving as a critical solution for high-risk applications in medicine, industry, and space exploration, where direct human intervention is impractical or hazardous. Despite these advances, persistent technical and operational challenges, such as latency-induced instability and limited real-world validation, restrict broader adoption, necessitating a systematic evaluation of emerging technologies and their integrations to bridge the gap between laboratory prototypes and field-deployable systems. To this end, we conducted a Systematic Mapping Study across Scopus, IEEE Xplore, and Web of Science, screening 3,957 records and selecting 339 primary studies from 2019 to mid-2024 for in-depth analysis. The results categorize advancements into eight key groups: exoskeletons, haptic devices, immersive technologies, neural interfaces, motion and biometric sensing systems, direct input and control interfaces, advanced identification and communication systems, and combinations. The findings reveal a pronounced shift toward multimodal hybrids (<italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">e.g</i>., haptic-immersive fusions) that enhance operator precision, situational awareness, and ergonomic usability across domains. However, communication latency remains the predominant barrier, with delays over 200 ms compromising stability and safety irrespective of interface complexity. These findings underscore that while hybrid integrations mitigate isolated limitations, domain-specific tolerances —such as near-zero in medicine versus moderate in industry— demand tailored optimizations for effective deployment. Future research should prioritize rigorous field trials with standardized benchmarks (<italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">e.g</i>., NASA-TLX for workload and FMEA for safety) for combined technologies, alongside the development of 6G-enabled predictive algorithms to preempt latency issues, ensuring scalable, resilient teleoperation in critical scenarios.

IEEE AccessVol. 14
University of Atacama (CL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.