Using Student Learning Assessment Data to Drive Pedagogical Innovation and Quality in Higher Education: A Meta‐Synthesis

ABSTRACT The present article focuses on faculty members' use of student learning assessment data to drive pedagogical innovation. Fuelled by policy recommendations, the high‐level commitment to assessment and data‐based decision‐making has proliferated in higher education contexts. However, evidence from the ground shows that these practices are still problematic. Given the relevant changes in policy and practice in higher education systems and the call for the ground‐up re‐development of assessment, a systematic review of qualitative studies has been performed. More specifically, this meta‐synthesis considered 11 studies conducted in 4 English‐speaking countries that outline the landscape of student learning assessment and data use literature over a 10‐year period (2013–2022). Three main themes emerge from this study: namely, the pluralism of assessment practices and instruments; a (dis)connection between assessment practice, quality assurance, and the teaching‐learning process; and the persistent concerns of faculty members about assessment and policy requirements. Implications for educational research and practice are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Higher Education Quarterly
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.70117
Primary Topic
Educational Assessment and Improvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using Student Learning Assessment Data to Drive Pedagogical Innovation and Quality in Higher Education: A Meta‐Synthesis

Serafina Pastore
Higher Education Quarterly
Educational Assessment and Improvement
article

Using Student Learning Assessment Data to Drive Pedagogical Innovation and Quality in Higher Education: A Meta‐Synthesis

Serafina Pastore
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The present article focuses on faculty members' use of student learning assessment data to drive pedagogical innovation. Fuelled by policy recommendations, the high‐level commitment to assessment and data‐based decision‐making has proliferated in higher education contexts. However, evidence from the ground shows that these practices are still problematic. Given the relevant changes in policy and practice in higher education systems and the call for the ground‐up re‐development of assessment, a systematic review of qualitative studies has been performed. More specifically, this meta‐synthesis considered 11 studies conducted in 4 English‐speaking countries that outline the landscape of student learning assessment and data use literature over a 10‐year period (2013–2022). Three main themes emerge from this study: namely, the pluralism of assessment practices and instruments; a (dis)connection between assessment practice, quality assurance, and the teaching‐learning process; and the persistent concerns of faculty members about assessment and policy requirements. Implications for educational research and practice are discussed.

Higher Education QuarterlyVol. 80(2)
University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Educational Assessment and Improvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.