Open vs. Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Impact on Identification and Preservation of Pelvic Autonomic Nerves and Effects on Urinary and Sexual Function and Quality of Life

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: With advances in surgical techniques for rectal cancer-particularly laparoscopic and robotic-assisted approaches-the choice of operative method may influence not only oncological but also functional outcomes. This study aimed to compare open and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery regarding pelvic autonomic nerve identification, preservation and its impact on postoperative urinary, sexual, and quality-of-life outcomes. <b>Methods</b>: A total of 181 patients who underwent curative rectal cancer surgery at the Clinic for Digestive Surgery, University Clinical Center of Serbia, were included. Six types of procedures were performed using both open and laparoscopic approaches. Intraoperative identification and preservation of pelvic autonomic nerves were assessed and verified postoperatively through evaluation of urinary, sexual, and quality-of-life parameters. Urinary function and related life quality were assessed using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS and IPSS-QoL), while sexual function was evaluated using gender-specific validated questionnaires (IIEF-15 and FSFI) preoperatively and at 2, 4, and 6 months postoperatively. <b>Results</b>: Nerve non-visualization and/or injuries were significantly more frequent in the open surgery group. The laparoscopic approach was associated with better preservation of urinary function, particularly among male patients, better sexual function in both sexes, and a transient advantage in quality of life. <b>Conclusions</b>: Laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery demonstrated superior pelvic autonomic nerve visualization and preservation and better short-term urinary and sexual function. Nonetheless, quality-of-life outcomes were comparable by 6 months of follow-up, underscoring the importance of meticulous nerve-preserving technique regardless of surgical approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-03-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15062421
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Open vs. Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Impact on Identification and Preservation of Pelvic Autonomic Nerves and Effects on Urinary and Sexual Function and Quality of Life

J Jelenkovic, Ivan Dimitrijević, Predrag Gavrilovic, Jovana Rosić Stojković et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
article

Open vs. Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Impact on Identification and Preservation of Pelvic Autonomic Nerves and Effects on Urinary and Sexual Function and Quality of Life

J Jelenkovic, Ivan Dimitrijević, Predrag Gavrilovic, Jovana Rosić Stojković, Goran Barisic, Aleksandar Sekulic, Marko Miladinov
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: With advances in surgical techniques for rectal cancer-particularly laparoscopic and robotic-assisted approaches-the choice of operative method may influence not only oncological but also functional outcomes. This study aimed to compare open and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery regarding pelvic autonomic nerve identification, preservation and its impact on postoperative urinary, sexual, and quality-of-life outcomes. <b>Methods</b>: A total of 181 patients who underwent curative rectal cancer surgery at the Clinic for Digestive Surgery, University Clinical Center of Serbia, were included. Six types of procedures were performed using both open and laparoscopic approaches. Intraoperative identification and preservation of pelvic autonomic nerves were assessed and verified postoperatively through evaluation of urinary, sexual, and quality-of-life parameters. Urinary function and related life quality were assessed using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS and IPSS-QoL), while sexual function was evaluated using gender-specific validated questionnaires (IIEF-15 and FSFI) preoperatively and at 2, 4, and 6 months postoperatively. <b>Results</b>: Nerve non-visualization and/or injuries were significantly more frequent in the open surgery group. The laparoscopic approach was associated with better preservation of urinary function, particularly among male patients, better sexual function in both sexes, and a transient advantage in quality of life. <b>Conclusions</b>: Laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery demonstrated superior pelvic autonomic nerve visualization and preservation and better short-term urinary and sexual function. Nonetheless, quality-of-life outcomes were comparable by 6 months of follow-up, underscoring the importance of meticulous nerve-preserving technique regardless of surgical approach.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(6)
University of Belgrade (RS), Center for Health, Exercise and Sport Sciences (RS), Centar za Promociju Nauke (RS)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.