Socio-humanitarian Aspects of Using AI in Scientific Publishing

This paper comprehensively examines the aspects of using the latest AI assistants in scientific publishing. The intermediate results of the introduction of generative artificial intelligence into the activities of researchers are evaluated, and the possible functions of AI at different levels-stages of the publication process - are described.: author, editor, reviewer, etc. The existing specialized tools based on generative artificial intelligence, the potential for increasing efficiency/reducing the time of the editorial and publishing cycle and their limitations are considered. The analysis of international AI regulatory practices in scientific publishing and the state of regulation in Russia is carried out. It is concluded that there are two main interrelated groups of socio-humanitarian aspects and risks: ethical and epistemological; as well as the secondary and non-unique nature of potential AI problems in science, primarily related to ignoring scientific ethos, principles of integrity and responsibility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Artificial Societies
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18254/s207751800037477-3
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Socio-humanitarian Aspects of Using AI in Scientific Publishing

V. A. Vetrov
Artificial Societies
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Socio-humanitarian Aspects of Using AI in Scientific Publishing

V. A. Vetrov
article en

Abstract

This paper comprehensively examines the aspects of using the latest AI assistants in scientific publishing. The intermediate results of the introduction of generative artificial intelligence into the activities of researchers are evaluated, and the possible functions of AI at different levels-stages of the publication process - are described.: author, editor, reviewer, etc. The existing specialized tools based on generative artificial intelligence, the potential for increasing efficiency/reducing the time of the editorial and publishing cycle and their limitations are considered. The analysis of international AI regulatory practices in scientific publishing and the state of regulation in Russia is carried out. It is concluded that there are two main interrelated groups of socio-humanitarian aspects and risks: ethical and epistemological; as well as the secondary and non-unique nature of potential AI problems in science, primarily related to ignoring scientific ethos, principles of integrity and responsibility.

Artificial SocietiesVol. 21(1)
Institute of Philosophy (RU), Development Agency of Serbia (RS)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.