The comet assay as a tool in human biomonitoring exposure to antineoplastic drugs – A systematic review and meta-analysis

Antineoplastic agents are toxic compounds, generally used in the treatment of cancers, which are recognized as carrying a cancer development risk. In this systematic review and meta-analysis of human biomonitoring studies, we have assessed the effects of exposure to antineoplastic drugs on levels of DNA strand breaks in leukocytes, measured by the comet assay. Focusing on the application of the comet assay in human biomonitoring of occupational exposure to antineoplastic agents, we have analyzed 458 original research studies which used this assay, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA-ScR). The systematic review led to 23 studies, of which 20 studies met the criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Using standardized mean difference and 95% confidence interval (CI), the meta-analyses show increased levels of DNA strand breaks in subjects exposed to antineoplastic drugs (1.26, 95% CI: 0.78, 1.73). Results originate mainly from studies on healthcare workers, with only one study in an industrial setting. Subgroup analysis indicates that all studies combined from middle-income countries have a higher effect size (1.77, 95% CI: 1.00, 2.55) than studies from high-income countries (0.49, 95% CI: 0.09, 0.90). This difference between middle- and high-income countries may be attributable in part to differences in exposure levels or exposure assessment. Additionally, sensitivity analysis indicates that studies with moderate/high risk of comet assay measurement bias have higher effect size (2.07, 95% CI: 0.82, 3.31) than studies with low risk of bias (0.73, 95% CI: 0.34, 1.13); and that studies with high risk of exposure misclassification have higher effect size (1.47, 95% CI: 0.89, 2.06) than studies with low/moderate risk (0.13, 955 CI: -0.08, 0.33). Most studies have low/moderate risk of bias related to the comet assay procedure (15 out of 20 studies), absence of reporting the use of assay controls (1 out of 20 studies), blinded analysis of samples (7 out 20 studies); exposure assessment (16 out of 20 studies). In conclusion, this systematic review and meta-analysis shows that exposure to antineoplastic drugs is associated with increased levels of DNA strand breaks in human leukocytes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2026.108590
Primary Topic
Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The comet assay as a tool in human biomonitoring exposure to antineoplastic drugs – A systematic review and meta-analysis

Ezgi Eyluel Bankoglu, Lisa Giovannelli, Anja Haverić, Carina Ladeira et al.
Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research
Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
article

The comet assay as a tool in human biomonitoring exposure to antineoplastic drugs – A systematic review and meta-analysis

Ezgi Eyluel Bankoglu, Lisa Giovannelli, Anja Haverić, Carina Ladeira, Peter Møller, Amaya Azqueta, Goran Gajski, Andrew V Collins, Helga Stopper, Marko Gerić
article en

Abstract

Antineoplastic agents are toxic compounds, generally used in the treatment of cancers, which are recognized as carrying a cancer development risk. In this systematic review and meta-analysis of human biomonitoring studies, we have assessed the effects of exposure to antineoplastic drugs on levels of DNA strand breaks in leukocytes, measured by the comet assay. Focusing on the application of the comet assay in human biomonitoring of occupational exposure to antineoplastic agents, we have analyzed 458 original research studies which used this assay, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA-ScR). The systematic review led to 23 studies, of which 20 studies met the criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Using standardized mean difference and 95% confidence interval (CI), the meta-analyses show increased levels of DNA strand breaks in subjects exposed to antineoplastic drugs (1.26, 95% CI: 0.78, 1.73). Results originate mainly from studies on healthcare workers, with only one study in an industrial setting. Subgroup analysis indicates that all studies combined from middle-income countries have a higher effect size (1.77, 95% CI: 1.00, 2.55) than studies from high-income countries (0.49, 95% CI: 0.09, 0.90). This difference between middle- and high-income countries may be attributable in part to differences in exposure levels or exposure assessment. Additionally, sensitivity analysis indicates that studies with moderate/high risk of comet assay measurement bias have higher effect size (2.07, 95% CI: 0.82, 3.31) than studies with low risk of bias (0.73, 95% CI: 0.34, 1.13); and that studies with high risk of exposure misclassification have higher effect size (1.47, 95% CI: 0.89, 2.06) than studies with low/moderate risk (0.13, 955 CI: -0.08, 0.33). Most studies have low/moderate risk of bias related to the comet assay procedure (15 out of 20 studies), absence of reporting the use of assay controls (1 out of 20 studies), blinded analysis of samples (7 out 20 studies); exposure assessment (16 out of 20 studies). In conclusion, this systematic review and meta-analysis shows that exposure to antineoplastic drugs is associated with increased levels of DNA strand breaks in human leukocytes.

Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation ResearchVol. 797
University of Sarajevo (BA), University of Copenhagen (DK), University of Oslo (NO), Universidade Politécnica de Lisboa (PT), University of Würzburg (DE), Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (DE), Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health (HR), University of Florence (IT), Universidad de Navarra (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.