Peaceful coexistence or inevitable clash? Confronting the claims of science and religion about death

Between September 26, 2022 and August 30, 2023, 5- to 12-year-old children and their parents (N = 258, 178 females, 1 nonbinary) from the U.S.A., judged conflicting scientific and religious claims with respect to death. Most secular participants endorsed the scientific claims and rejected the religious claims regardless of age, whereas most religious participants endorsed the religious claims and rejected the scientific claims, with this pattern becoming stronger with age. Nevertheless, dualistic explanations integrating both types of claims also increased with age regardless of religious background. Overall, when confronted with conflicting scientific and religious claims about death, most people endorse one claim over the other, depending on their background. The effort to reconcile both claims increases with age but never predominates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Child Development
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/chidev/aacag035
Primary Topic
Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Peaceful coexistence or inevitable clash? Confronting the claims of science and religion about death

Ayse Payir, Kathleen H. Corriveau, Paul L Harris
Child Development
Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
article

Peaceful coexistence or inevitable clash? Confronting the claims of science and religion about death

Ayse Payir, Kathleen H. Corriveau, Paul L Harris
article en

Abstract

Between September 26, 2022 and August 30, 2023, 5- to 12-year-old children and their parents (N = 258, 178 females, 1 nonbinary) from the U.S.A., judged conflicting scientific and religious claims with respect to death. Most secular participants endorsed the scientific claims and rejected the religious claims regardless of age, whereas most religious participants endorsed the religious claims and rejected the scientific claims, with this pattern becoming stronger with age. Nevertheless, dualistic explanations integrating both types of claims also increased with age regardless of religious background. Overall, when confronted with conflicting scientific and religious claims about death, most people endorse one claim over the other, depending on their background. The effort to reconcile both claims increases with age but never predominates.

Child Development
Union College (US), Harvard University Press (US), Wheelock College (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Peaceful coexistence or inevitable clash? Confronting the claims of science and religion about death — Ayse Payir, Kathleen H. Corriveau, et al. · Child Development (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS