Dealing with dilemmas in daily clinical practice: The development and evaluation of the seminar “suddenly, at the hospital” aimed at promoting professional identity formation in the final practical year of undergraduate medical education

Aim: In everyday clinical practice, (future) physicians are confronted with dilemmas for which there are no clear solutions and which cannot be solved using clinical knowledge alone. To prepare medical students for such situations and support their formation of a professional identity, we developed a seminar that didactically applies elements of case-based clinical reasoning and storification to situations and potential professional strategies (medical professionalism). Project description: An interdisciplinary working group generated 28 ideas for cases depicting clinical dilemmas. These case ideas were assigned to five categories: Patient, colleague, supervisor, relatives, and self. These case ideas were then presented to medical students. A course concept was developed for the case idea in each category that garnered the highest level of interest. To develop the seminar sessions, teaching strategies were selected which encouraged reflection and participation. The course evaluation was carried out using a questionnaire. Results: The five seminar topics dealt with (1) no medical insurance (patient), (2) covering up a complication in medical treatment (colleague), (3) medical confidentiality (relatives), (4) conflict of roles (supervisor), and (5) romantic feelings toward patients (self). The seminar entailed five sessions, each one consisting of four teaching units. The course evaluations (N=16 practical-year (PY) students; age: M=26.50; SD=2.83; female: n=13) registered a high level of satisfaction among the students in regard to the course content and pedagogical approach. Conclusion: It was possible to successfully design and implement a course concept interlinking case-based clinical reasoning, storification and medical professionalism. The seminar enabled students to get a grasp on situations that go beyond clinical knowledge and develop strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
German Medical Science (German Research Foundation)
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001823
Primary Topic
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dealing with dilemmas in daily clinical practice: The development and evaluation of the seminar “suddenly, at the hospital” aimed at promoting professional identity formation in the final practical year of undergraduate medical education

Christopher Werner Karl Holzmann-Littig, Teresa Bertram, Moritz Schumm, Kristina Schick et al.
German Medical Science (German Research Foundation)
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
article

Dealing with dilemmas in daily clinical practice: The development and evaluation of the seminar “suddenly, at the hospital” aimed at promoting professional identity formation in the final practical year of undergraduate medical education

Christopher Werner Karl Holzmann-Littig, Teresa Bertram, Moritz Schumm, Kristina Schick, Nikolaos Sapoutzis, Verena Kantenwein, Marjo Wijnen-Meijer, Marie-Christine Fritzsche
article en

Abstract

Aim: In everyday clinical practice, (future) physicians are confronted with dilemmas for which there are no clear solutions and which cannot be solved using clinical knowledge alone. To prepare medical students for such situations and support their formation of a professional identity, we developed a seminar that didactically applies elements of case-based clinical reasoning and storification to situations and potential professional strategies (medical professionalism). Project description: An interdisciplinary working group generated 28 ideas for cases depicting clinical dilemmas. These case ideas were assigned to five categories: Patient, colleague, supervisor, relatives, and self. These case ideas were then presented to medical students. A course concept was developed for the case idea in each category that garnered the highest level of interest. To develop the seminar sessions, teaching strategies were selected which encouraged reflection and participation. The course evaluation was carried out using a questionnaire. Results: The five seminar topics dealt with (1) no medical insurance (patient), (2) covering up a complication in medical treatment (colleague), (3) medical confidentiality (relatives), (4) conflict of roles (supervisor), and (5) romantic feelings toward patients (self). The seminar entailed five sessions, each one consisting of four teaching units. The course evaluations (N=16 practical-year (PY) students; age: M=26.50; SD=2.83; female: n=13) registered a high level of satisfaction among the students in regard to the course content and pedagogical approach. Conclusion: It was possible to successfully design and implement a course concept interlinking case-based clinical reasoning, storification and medical professionalism. The seminar enabled students to get a grasp on situations that go beyond clinical knowledge and develop strategies.

German Medical Science (German Research Foundation)
TUM Klinikum (DE), Gesundheitsamt (DE), Accadis Hochschule Bad Homburg (DE), Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DE), NephroCare (ES), Deutsches Herzzentrum München (DE), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.