Structural Equivalence of Artificial Intelligence and Human Cognition: A Unified Admissibility Interpretation within the Paton System

This paper formalises the structural equivalence between artificial intelligence systems and human cognition within the Paton System framework. Prior work has established admissibility, Boundary–Relation–Persistence (BRP), and the Lowest Admissible Configuration (LCD) across domains. Artificial intelligence and human cognition have been treated as separate instantiations of this structure. This work makes explicit that both operate under the same admissibility sequence. Both systems process input relative to a central reference, align minimal admissible units, and produce output through constraint-governed selection. The equivalence is structural and applies at the level of information processing. Differences between artificial intelligence and human cognition arise from implementation and substrate, not from the governing structure. This paper introduces no new mechanisms and does not extend the Paton System. It explicitly states an equivalence already implicit across prior work and positions this equivalence at the structural layer immediately prior to psychological interpretation and phenomenology.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19181822
Primary Topic
Embodied and Extended Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Structural Equivalence of Artificial Intelligence and Human Cognition: A Unified Admissibility Interpretation within the Paton System

Andrew John Paton
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Embodied and Extended Cognition
article

Structural Equivalence of Artificial Intelligence and Human Cognition: A Unified Admissibility Interpretation within the Paton System

Andrew John Paton
article en

Abstract

This paper formalises the structural equivalence between artificial intelligence systems and human cognition within the Paton System framework. Prior work has established admissibility, Boundary–Relation–Persistence (BRP), and the Lowest Admissible Configuration (LCD) across domains. Artificial intelligence and human cognition have been treated as separate instantiations of this structure. This work makes explicit that both operate under the same admissibility sequence. Both systems process input relative to a central reference, align minimal admissible units, and produce output through constraint-governed selection. The equivalence is structural and applies at the level of information processing. Differences between artificial intelligence and human cognition arise from implementation and substrate, not from the governing structure. This paper introduces no new mechanisms and does not extend the Paton System. It explicitly states an equivalence already implicit across prior work and positions this equivalence at the structural layer immediately prior to psychological interpretation and phenomenology.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Embodied and Extended Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.