On FDE, theory closure, and related themes: responses to Calasso & Logan, Caret, Omori & Arenhart, and Standefer, Shear & French

Abstract This paper comprises responses to (in alphabetical order) Calasso and Logan (2023), Caret (2024), Omori and Arenhart (2023), and Standefer, Shear, and French (2023). Given space limitations, responses are not exhaustive; future work will engage the work further. The target papers divide roughly into philosophy of logic and strictly philosophical logic (some formal logic fueled by some philosophical issue). The former, being largely dialectical, requires more ink; the latter, except to the extent that it dips a toe into philosophy of logic, stands on its own promise and results. I am deeply honored by the contributions of each paper, and hereby thank all involved.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Philosophy
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44204-026-00386-z
Primary Topic
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On FDE, theory closure, and related themes: responses to Calasso & Logan, Caret, Omori & Arenhart, and Standefer, Shear & French

Jc Beall
Asian Journal of Philosophy
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
article

On FDE, theory closure, and related themes: responses to Calasso & Logan, Caret, Omori & Arenhart, and Standefer, Shear & French

Jc Beall
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper comprises responses to (in alphabetical order) Calasso and Logan (2023), Caret (2024), Omori and Arenhart (2023), and Standefer, Shear, and French (2023). Given space limitations, responses are not exhaustive; future work will engage the work further. The target papers divide roughly into philosophy of logic and strictly philosophical logic (some formal logic fueled by some philosophical issue). The former, being largely dialectical, requires more ink; the latter, except to the extent that it dips a toe into philosophy of logic, stands on its own promise and results. I am deeply honored by the contributions of each paper, and hereby thank all involved.

Asian Journal of PhilosophyVol. 5(1)
University of Notre Dame (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.