Abstract B010: Common translational challenges in brain tumour therapeutic development identified through a multidisciplinary accelerator programme

Abstract The purpose of this thematic analysis was to synthesise key translational challenges identified through the Brain Tumour Research Novel Therapeutics Accelerator (BTR-NTA), an international, multidisciplinary programme established to support the development of novel brain tumour therapies and accelerate their progression towards clinical application through structured expert input. Between 2023 to 2025, BTR-NTA received 33 applications and provided up to 240 hours of tailored input – from experts in preclinical, clinical, regulatory, commercialisation and patient advocacy domains - for 15 academic and industry groups developing novel brain tumour therapies. A thematic analysis was then conducted across these 15 therapeutic development programmes reviewed within the accelerator, using the structured feedback reports provided to applicants to identify recurring development challenges. The analysis identified common challenges across all major stages of therapeutic development, for which the Committee provided input and guidance. 93% of programmes were provided with input to refine their preclinical strategies, including the use of more clinically relevant disease models and potential collaboration partners. Similar proportions (87%) exhibited gaps in pharmacology and toxicology planning that posed potential risks to progression towards first-in-human studies. Clinical development planning input was provided to 100% of programmes, including recommendations on patient selection criteria, dosing schedule and biomarker selection. Regulatory engagement strategies were also provided for 87% of programmes, most commonly relating to the timing and nature of regulatory engagement and anticipated data requirements. Finally, 93% of applicants received guidance on their patient and public involvement and engagement strategy. Follow-up with applicants one year after their BTR-NTA review is beginning to demonstrate the long-term impact of this guidance, with 100% of applicants who responded reporting they had adapted an aspect of their development strategy based on advice from their BTR-NTA review, and 100% reporting receiving follow on funding from government, charitable and venture capital sources. These findings demonstrate that scientifically promising therapeutic programmes consistently faced a number of translational challenges that could delay or prevent successful clinical progression if left unaddressed. The primary objective of the BTR-NTA programme is to identify these risks early and to provide targeted, practical solutions. Wider dissemination of these learnings is hoped to improve translational efficiency and accelerate progress towards effective new treatments for people with brain tumours. Citation Format: Eloise Lines, Charlotte Aitken, Katie Bushby, Nicky Huskens, Karen Noble, Paul Brennan, Helen Bulbeck, Petra Hamerlik, Darren Hargrave, Edward Kaye, Dione Kobayashi, Ryan Mathew, Javad Nazarian, Ruman Rahman, Artie Romero, Erik Sulman, Juanita Lopez, Kanneboyina Nagaraju. Common translational challenges in brain tumour therapeutic development identified through a multidisciplinary accelerator programme [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Brain Cancer; 2026 Mar 23-25; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(6_Suppl):Abstract nr B010.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.brain26-b010
Primary Topic
Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract B010: Common translational challenges in brain tumour therapeutic development identified through a multidisciplinary accelerator programme

Nicky Huskens, Petra Hamerlik, Dione Kobayashi, Erik P. Sulman et al.
Cancer Research
Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
article

Abstract B010: Common translational challenges in brain tumour therapeutic development identified through a multidisciplinary accelerator programme

Nicky Huskens, Petra Hamerlik, Dione Kobayashi, Erik P. Sulman, Charlotte Aitken, Juanita Lopez, Kanneboyina Nagaraju, Paul Brennan, Edward M. Kaye, Katie Bushby, Eloise Lines, ARTIE E. ROMERO, H Bulbeck, Ryan Mathew, Darren Hargrave, Ruman Rahman, Karen Noble, Javad Nazarian
article en

Abstract

Abstract The purpose of this thematic analysis was to synthesise key translational challenges identified through the Brain Tumour Research Novel Therapeutics Accelerator (BTR-NTA), an international, multidisciplinary programme established to support the development of novel brain tumour therapies and accelerate their progression towards clinical application through structured expert input. Between 2023 to 2025, BTR-NTA received 33 applications and provided up to 240 hours of tailored input – from experts in preclinical, clinical, regulatory, commercialisation and patient advocacy domains - for 15 academic and industry groups developing novel brain tumour therapies. A thematic analysis was then conducted across these 15 therapeutic development programmes reviewed within the accelerator, using the structured feedback reports provided to applicants to identify recurring development challenges. The analysis identified common challenges across all major stages of therapeutic development, for which the Committee provided input and guidance. 93% of programmes were provided with input to refine their preclinical strategies, including the use of more clinically relevant disease models and potential collaboration partners. Similar proportions (87%) exhibited gaps in pharmacology and toxicology planning that posed potential risks to progression towards first-in-human studies. Clinical development planning input was provided to 100% of programmes, including recommendations on patient selection criteria, dosing schedule and biomarker selection. Regulatory engagement strategies were also provided for 87% of programmes, most commonly relating to the timing and nature of regulatory engagement and anticipated data requirements. Finally, 93% of applicants received guidance on their patient and public involvement and engagement strategy. Follow-up with applicants one year after their BTR-NTA review is beginning to demonstrate the long-term impact of this guidance, with 100% of applicants who responded reporting they had adapted an aspect of their development strategy based on advice from their BTR-NTA review, and 100% reporting receiving follow on funding from government, charitable and venture capital sources. These findings demonstrate that scientifically promising therapeutic programmes consistently faced a number of translational challenges that could delay or prevent successful clinical progression if left unaddressed. The primary objective of the BTR-NTA programme is to identify these risks early and to provide targeted, practical solutions. Wider dissemination of these learnings is hoped to improve translational efficiency and accelerate progress towards effective new treatments for people with brain tumours. Citation Format: Eloise Lines, Charlotte Aitken, Katie Bushby, Nicky Huskens, Karen Noble, Paul Brennan, Helen Bulbeck, Petra Hamerlik, Darren Hargrave, Edward Kaye, Dione Kobayashi, Ryan Mathew, Javad Nazarian, Ruman Rahman, Artie Romero, Erik Sulman, Juanita Lopez, Kanneboyina Nagaraju. Common translational challenges in brain tumour therapeutic development identified through a multidisciplinary accelerator programme [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Brain Cancer; 2026 Mar 23-25; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(6_Suppl):Abstract nr B010.

Cancer ResearchVol. 86(6_Supplement)
Brigham Young University (US), Binghamton University (US), Entrust (GB), University of Nottingham (GB), Institute of Cancer Research (GB), Duke University (US), Durham University (GB), Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), Great Ormond Street Hospital (GB), Cancer Research UK (GB), Milton Keynes Hospital (GB), University of Manchester (GB), London Cancer (GB), University Children's Hospital Zurich (CH), CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence (GB), Spero Therapeutics (United States) (US), University College London (GB), Saint Louis University (US), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.