Percutaneous coronary intervention in patients aged ≤40 years: a 10-year single-centre cohort study

Background Coronary artery disease (CAD) in adults aged ≤40 years is increasing, yet long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the drug-eluting stent (DES) era remain unclear. We aimed to identify procedural patterns and prognostic factors in this very young cohort. Methods This single-centre retrospective cohort study included 312 consecutive patients aged ≤40 years who underwent successful PCI for de novo lesions (≥70% stenosis) between 2014 and 2024. Baseline characteristics, quantitative coronary angiography, and procedural data were collected. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). Cox regression identified independent predictors. Results Patients were 82% men (mean age 36.8 ± 4.9 years) with a median SYNTAX score of 16. Procedural success was 98.4% with 93.9% DES implantation and 85.9% radial access. Over 1,620 patient-years (median 5.2 years), MACCE occurred at 27.8 per 1,000 patient-years (5-year cumulative 14.2%). Cardiac mortality was 3.7 per 1,000 patient-years. Diabetes [adjusted hazard ratios (HR) 1.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06–2.99], SYNTAX score ≥23 (HR 2.01, 1.19–3.40), and dual antiplatelet therapy <12 months (HR 1.62, 1.00–2.64) independently predicted MACCE. Conclusions Young adults undergoing PCI exhibit complex anatomy but low cardiac mortality. Diabetes, angiographic complexity, and abbreviated antiplatelet therapy are key drive of adverse events, warranting intensive prevention and optimised antiplatelet strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2026.1748236
Primary Topic
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Percutaneous coronary intervention in patients aged ≤40 years: a 10-year single-centre cohort study

Chunsong Wang, Lining Liang, Huawei Dong
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
article

Percutaneous coronary intervention in patients aged ≤40 years: a 10-year single-centre cohort study

Chunsong Wang, Lining Liang, Huawei Dong
article en

Abstract

Background Coronary artery disease (CAD) in adults aged ≤40 years is increasing, yet long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the drug-eluting stent (DES) era remain unclear. We aimed to identify procedural patterns and prognostic factors in this very young cohort. Methods This single-centre retrospective cohort study included 312 consecutive patients aged ≤40 years who underwent successful PCI for de novo lesions (≥70% stenosis) between 2014 and 2024. Baseline characteristics, quantitative coronary angiography, and procedural data were collected. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). Cox regression identified independent predictors. Results Patients were 82% men (mean age 36.8 ± 4.9 years) with a median SYNTAX score of 16. Procedural success was 98.4% with 93.9% DES implantation and 85.9% radial access. Over 1,620 patient-years (median 5.2 years), MACCE occurred at 27.8 per 1,000 patient-years (5-year cumulative 14.2%). Cardiac mortality was 3.7 per 1,000 patient-years. Diabetes [adjusted hazard ratios (HR) 1.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06–2.99], SYNTAX score ≥23 (HR 2.01, 1.19–3.40), and dual antiplatelet therapy <12 months (HR 1.62, 1.00–2.64) independently predicted MACCE. Conclusions Young adults undergoing PCI exhibit complex anatomy but low cardiac mortality. Diabetes, angiographic complexity, and abbreviated antiplatelet therapy are key drive of adverse events, warranting intensive prevention and optimised antiplatelet strategies.

Frontiers in Cardiovascular MedicineVol. 13
Liaocheng People's Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.