The extinction distances for over a thousand planetary nebulae with

Context. Although Gaia has identified the central stars of planetary nebulae (CSPNe) for about 70% of known Galactic planetary nebulae (PNe), reliable distance estimates remain highly incomplete, with fewer than one quarter having accurate parallaxes. Mean-while, the classical extinction–distance sample has long been limited to about 70 objects, accounting for only 1.8 of the Galactic PNe population. Aims. We aim to obtain a large and homogeneous catalogue of PN distances by refining extinction–distance measurements with Gaia DR3, providing a complementary method to CSPN-parallax-based distances. Methods. We developed a Gaia-based extinction–distance method for PNe by combining an improved blue-edge approach with an extinction-jump model. Planetary nebula distances were inferred from stellar extinction jumps in line-of-sight extinction–distance profiles and constrained by comparisons with published distances, stellar spatial distributions relative to the PN centre, and the PN radius–distance relation. Results. We obtain distances for 1066 PNe, with a median relative uncertainty of 13% and below 20% for about 87% of the sample. This sample includes 765 objects whose CSPN parallaxes have relative uncertainties greater than 20% and 128 objects without CSPN parallaxes. Our method not only complements CSPN parallax-based approaches for PN distance determination but also extends the traditional extinction-based approach to higher Galactic latitudes. In cases where published distance estimates for the same PN differ significantly, the method helps identify the more reliable distance. In addition, it helps evaluate the reliability of CSPN identifications. We find a likely misidentification in the reported CSPN for Fr2–36, and further analyse 33 PNe with two different CSPNe identifications, suggesting a more suitable CSPN for 15 objects. The resulting catalogue is the largest homogeneous set of extinction-based PN distances to date and provides a robust benchmark for studies of Galactic structure, PN populations, and interstellar extinction.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202658854/pdf
Primary Topic
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The extinction distances for over a thousand planetary nebulae with

Juan Deng, Licai Deng, Biwei Jiang, Shu Wang
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
article

The extinction distances for over a thousand planetary nebulae with

Juan Deng, Licai Deng, Biwei Jiang, Shu Wang
article en

Abstract

Context. Although Gaia has identified the central stars of planetary nebulae (CSPNe) for about 70% of known Galactic planetary nebulae (PNe), reliable distance estimates remain highly incomplete, with fewer than one quarter having accurate parallaxes. Mean-while, the classical extinction–distance sample has long been limited to about 70 objects, accounting for only 1.8 of the Galactic PNe population. Aims. We aim to obtain a large and homogeneous catalogue of PN distances by refining extinction–distance measurements with Gaia DR3, providing a complementary method to CSPN-parallax-based distances. Methods. We developed a Gaia-based extinction–distance method for PNe by combining an improved blue-edge approach with an extinction-jump model. Planetary nebula distances were inferred from stellar extinction jumps in line-of-sight extinction–distance profiles and constrained by comparisons with published distances, stellar spatial distributions relative to the PN centre, and the PN radius–distance relation. Results. We obtain distances for 1066 PNe, with a median relative uncertainty of 13% and below 20% for about 87% of the sample. This sample includes 765 objects whose CSPN parallaxes have relative uncertainties greater than 20% and 128 objects without CSPN parallaxes. Our method not only complements CSPN parallax-based approaches for PN distance determination but also extends the traditional extinction-based approach to higher Galactic latitudes. In cases where published distance estimates for the same PN differ significantly, the method helps identify the more reliable distance. In addition, it helps evaluate the reliability of CSPN identifications. We find a likely misidentification in the reported CSPN for Fr2–36, and further analyse 33 PNe with two different CSPNe identifications, suggesting a more suitable CSPN for 15 objects. The resulting catalogue is the largest homogeneous set of extinction-based PN distances to date and provides a robust benchmark for studies of Galactic structure, PN populations, and interstellar extinction.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.