International comparison of equity gradients in hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions

Hospitalizations for Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions (ACSCs) are thought to be avoidable with effective preventive care and early disease management, usually delivered in community-based ambulatory care settings. These hospitalizations are both costly and sensitive to the socioeconomic situation of patients. Understanding whether different health systems mitigate the sensitivity of ACSCs to socioeconomic gradients may direct attention to equity-improving approaches to ambulatory health care. This study sought to identify differences in the gradient of Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions (ACSC) relative to socioeconomic status across nine countries, namely Australia, Canada, England, Finland, France, New Zealand, Spain, Switzerland, and the United States (US). The nine countries participating in the International Collaborative on Costs, Outcomes, and Needs in Care (ICCONIC) calculated age—and sex-specific ACSC hospitalization rates between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2019, based on data from national data sources on hospitalization and sociodemographic information at small-area levels. We used a common definition of ACSC indicators developed through a literature review of indicators routinely used in healthcare performance monitoring. We employed linear regression models to assess inequalities in ACSC association with area-level socioeconomic deprivation and income using the Slope Index of Inequality and the Relative Index of Inequality. A persistent pattern higher ACSC hospitalization rates for individuals in most disadvantaged areas remained irrespective of the socioeconomic status measure used. There was, however, considerable variation in relative equity gradients in ACSC hospitalizations between countries. Using the nine condition ACSC definition, the greatest inequalities were observed in England (RII = 0.26), and the least inequalities in ACSC hospitalizations were observed in Spain (RII = 0.68) in the 18 + cohort. A consistent equity gradient in ACSC hospitalizations was observed across high-income countries included in this study. Addressing these inequities with targeted policies can reduce the cost of care while improving access to high quality care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-14406-4
Primary Topic
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

International comparison of equity gradients in hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions

Jean Pierre Uwitonze, Aaron Hedquist, Grace Spiro, F Estupiñán-Romero et al.
BMC Health Services Research
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
article

International comparison of equity gradients in hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions

Jean Pierre Uwitonze, Aaron Hedquist, Grace Spiro, F Estupiñán-Romero, Irene Papanicolas, Mai Stafford, Olukorede Abiona, Carl Rudolf Blankart, Nicholas Bowden, Reijo Sund, Anne Penneau, Anne Alarilla, Zeynep Or, Yu Bai, Luís Gomes, Philip Haywood, Joachim Marti, George Stevenson, Jose Francisco Figueroa, Walter Wodchis, Enrique Bernal-Delgado
article en

Abstract

Hospitalizations for Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions (ACSCs) are thought to be avoidable with effective preventive care and early disease management, usually delivered in community-based ambulatory care settings. These hospitalizations are both costly and sensitive to the socioeconomic situation of patients. Understanding whether different health systems mitigate the sensitivity of ACSCs to socioeconomic gradients may direct attention to equity-improving approaches to ambulatory health care. This study sought to identify differences in the gradient of Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions (ACSC) relative to socioeconomic status across nine countries, namely Australia, Canada, England, Finland, France, New Zealand, Spain, Switzerland, and the United States (US). The nine countries participating in the International Collaborative on Costs, Outcomes, and Needs in Care (ICCONIC) calculated age—and sex-specific ACSC hospitalization rates between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2019, based on data from national data sources on hospitalization and sociodemographic information at small-area levels. We used a common definition of ACSC indicators developed through a literature review of indicators routinely used in healthcare performance monitoring. We employed linear regression models to assess inequalities in ACSC association with area-level socioeconomic deprivation and income using the Slope Index of Inequality and the Relative Index of Inequality. A persistent pattern higher ACSC hospitalization rates for individuals in most disadvantaged areas remained irrespective of the socioeconomic status measure used. There was, however, considerable variation in relative equity gradients in ACSC hospitalizations between countries. Using the nine condition ACSC definition, the greatest inequalities were observed in England (RII = 0.26), and the least inequalities in ACSC hospitalizations were observed in Spain (RII = 0.68) in the 18 + cohort. A consistent equity gradient in ACSC hospitalizations was observed across high-income countries included in this study. Addressing these inequities with targeted policies can reduce the cost of care while improving access to high quality care.

BMC Health Services Research
University of Technology Sydney (AU), University of Bern (CH), University Health Network (CA), Harvard University (US), University of Eastern Finland (FI), Brown University (US), Trillium Health Centre (CA), Institut de Recherche et de Documentation en Économie de la Santé (FR), Swiss Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CH), Servicio Aragonés de Salud (ES), Health Foundation (GB), Sinai Health System (CA), Centre universitaire de médecine générale et santé publique, Lausanne (CH), University of Otago (NZ), University of Lausanne (CH)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.