Three-dimensional morphology–performance mapping for organic solar cells: A data-driven framework

Abstract Computational design of high-efficiency organic photovoltaics requires clear links between three-dimensional active-layer morphology and device performance. We present a data-driven workflow that first uses coreset selection to distill a large library of simulated morphologies into a small, representative subset, thereby focusing expensive morphology-aware exciton drift–diffusion simulations where they matter most. Using two device performance metrics, short-circuit current density, $$J_{\textrm{SC}}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>J</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>SC</mml:mtext> </mml:msub> </mml:math> , and fill factor, FF, from these simulations, we then apply feature-selection strategies to identify a handful of interpretable morphological descriptors that accurately predict both quantities. Sample-size ablations show that model accuracy, and the identity and rankings of the selected descriptors, remain stable with as few as 50 samples with the device performance. The descriptors most predictive of $$J_{\textrm{SC}}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>J</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>SC</mml:mtext> </mml:msub> </mml:math> differ from those for FF, reflecting distinct morphological bases for these two performance metrics. Moreover, cross-system comparisons (P3HT:PCBM vs. PM6:Y6) reveal shifts in the most influential descriptors, indicating that morphology–performance relationships are material-specific. Graphical abstract

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of materials research/Pratt's guide to venture capital sources
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1557/s43578-026-01823-8
Primary Topic
Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Three-dimensional morphology–performance mapping for organic solar cells: A data-driven framework

Ankush Kumar Mishra, Olga Wodo, Marjan Saadati, Nirmal Baishnab et al.
Journal of materials research/Pratt's guide to venture capital sources
Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics
article

Three-dimensional morphology–performance mapping for organic solar cells: A data-driven framework

Ankush Kumar Mishra, Olga Wodo, Marjan Saadati, Nirmal Baishnab, Baskar Ganapathysubramanian
article en

Abstract

Abstract Computational design of high-efficiency organic photovoltaics requires clear links between three-dimensional active-layer morphology and device performance. We present a data-driven workflow that first uses coreset selection to distill a large library of simulated morphologies into a small, representative subset, thereby focusing expensive morphology-aware exciton drift–diffusion simulations where they matter most. Using two device performance metrics, short-circuit current density, $$J_{\textrm{SC}}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>J</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>SC</mml:mtext> </mml:msub> </mml:math> , and fill factor, FF, from these simulations, we then apply feature-selection strategies to identify a handful of interpretable morphological descriptors that accurately predict both quantities. Sample-size ablations show that model accuracy, and the identity and rankings of the selected descriptors, remain stable with as few as 50 samples with the device performance. The descriptors most predictive of $$J_{\textrm{SC}}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>J</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>SC</mml:mtext> </mml:msub> </mml:math> differ from those for FF, reflecting distinct morphological bases for these two performance metrics. Moreover, cross-system comparisons (P3HT:PCBM vs. PM6:Y6) reveal shifts in the most influential descriptors, indicating that morphology–performance relationships are material-specific. Graphical abstract

Journal of materials research/Pratt's guide to venture capital sources
Iowa State University (US), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Three-dimensional morphology–performance mapping for organic solar cells: A data-driven framework — Ankush Kumar Mishra, Olga Wodo, et al. · Journal of materials research/Pratt's guide to venture capital sources (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS