Dental Amalgam and Oral Biological Responses: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence

Dental amalgam remains widely used in restorative dentistry due to its durability and cost-effectiveness, yet concerns persist regarding potential biological effects related to mercury release. This narrative review critically synthesizes current evidence on oral mucosal alterations and salivary biomarker changes reported in association with amalgam restorations. Experimental research supports biological plausibility for oxidative and inflammatory responses to mercury exposure; however, most human evidence derives from observational studies demonstrating heterogeneous associations rather than consistent causal relationships. Reported variations in salivary biomarkers, including interleukin-8 and ceruloplasmin, are generally modest and influenced by confounding factors such as periodontal status, smoking, and systemic inflammation. Histopathological findings adjacent to amalgam restorations include epithelial and inflammatory changes, though many are nonspecific and comparable to other chronic irritative conditions. Overall, current clinical and epidemiological data do not indicate uniform or clinically significant adverse effects in the general population attributable solely to dental amalgam. Regulatory phase-down initiatives primarily reflect environmental and precautionary policies. Available evidence supports a balanced and evidence-based interpretation of amalgam-related biological findings in contemporary dental practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dentistry Journal
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/dj14030188
Primary Topic
Mercury impact and mitigation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dental Amalgam and Oral Biological Responses: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence

Gabriel Valeriu Popa, Madălina Nicoleta Matei, Dana Tutunaru, Kamel Earar et al.
Dentistry Journal
Mercury impact and mitigation studies
article

Dental Amalgam and Oral Biological Responses: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence

Gabriel Valeriu Popa, Madălina Nicoleta Matei, Dana Tutunaru, Kamel Earar, Antoanela Magdalena Covaci, C M Petcu, Ada Stefanescu, Catalin-Bogdan Satala, Roxana Adina Barascu Petrescu, Roxana-Cristina Mehedinti
article en

Abstract

Dental amalgam remains widely used in restorative dentistry due to its durability and cost-effectiveness, yet concerns persist regarding potential biological effects related to mercury release. This narrative review critically synthesizes current evidence on oral mucosal alterations and salivary biomarker changes reported in association with amalgam restorations. Experimental research supports biological plausibility for oxidative and inflammatory responses to mercury exposure; however, most human evidence derives from observational studies demonstrating heterogeneous associations rather than consistent causal relationships. Reported variations in salivary biomarkers, including interleukin-8 and ceruloplasmin, are generally modest and influenced by confounding factors such as periodontal status, smoking, and systemic inflammation. Histopathological findings adjacent to amalgam restorations include epithelial and inflammatory changes, though many are nonspecific and comparable to other chronic irritative conditions. Overall, current clinical and epidemiological data do not indicate uniform or clinically significant adverse effects in the general population attributable solely to dental amalgam. Regulatory phase-down initiatives primarily reflect environmental and precautionary policies. Available evidence supports a balanced and evidence-based interpretation of amalgam-related biological findings in contemporary dental practice.

Dentistry JournalVol. 14(3)
Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest (RO), University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova (RO), "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati (RO), County Hospital (GB), Spitalul Clinic de Urgenta Sfantul Ioan (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Mercury impact and mitigation studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.