Validation of the Persian version of the computer ergonomics knowledge assessment questionnaire among frequent computer users

This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the Persian version of the Computer Ergonomics Knowledge Assessment Questionnaire (CEKAQ), designed to evaluate ergonomic knowledge among frequent computer users. The original English questionnaire was translated and culturally adapted following standardized guidelines. Content validity was evaluated through expert review using the Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Content Validity Index (CVI); 12 items with low CVR were removed, and the remaining 23 items achieved a CVI of 0.99. Reliability was assessed via test-retest with 20 users, using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Construct validity was examined through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on responses from 328 university students. The ICC was 0.813 (p < 0.001), indicating acceptable test-retest reliability. Factor analysis led to the removal of four items with low factor loadings (< 0.3), resulting in a final 19-item version that explained 28.4% of the total variance. CFA confirmed this unidimensional structure with robust fit indices (e.g., CFI = 0.931, RMSEA = 0.039). Internal consistency was acceptable (KR-20 = 0.759). The 19-item Persian CEKAQ demonstrated good content validity, acceptable reliability, and confirmed construct validity. It is a suitable tool for assessing ergonomic knowledge among computer users. Further refinement is recommended by expanding item content and diversifying the study population to enhance construct coverage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-45142-8
Primary Topic
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of the Persian version of the computer ergonomics knowledge assessment questionnaire among frequent computer users

Mohammad Javad Azadchehr, Elaheh Mianehsaz, Negin Masoudi-Alavi, Mahdi Rafiyan et al.
Scientific Reports
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
article

Validation of the Persian version of the computer ergonomics knowledge assessment questionnaire among frequent computer users

Mohammad Javad Azadchehr, Elaheh Mianehsaz, Negin Masoudi-Alavi, Mahdi Rafiyan, Fatemeh Hajrezaie
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the Persian version of the Computer Ergonomics Knowledge Assessment Questionnaire (CEKAQ), designed to evaluate ergonomic knowledge among frequent computer users. The original English questionnaire was translated and culturally adapted following standardized guidelines. Content validity was evaluated through expert review using the Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Content Validity Index (CVI); 12 items with low CVR were removed, and the remaining 23 items achieved a CVI of 0.99. Reliability was assessed via test-retest with 20 users, using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Construct validity was examined through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on responses from 328 university students. The ICC was 0.813 (p < 0.001), indicating acceptable test-retest reliability. Factor analysis led to the removal of four items with low factor loadings (< 0.3), resulting in a final 19-item version that explained 28.4% of the total variance. CFA confirmed this unidimensional structure with robust fit indices (e.g., CFI = 0.931, RMSEA = 0.039). Internal consistency was acceptable (KR-20 = 0.759). The 19-item Persian CEKAQ demonstrated good content validity, acceptable reliability, and confirmed construct validity. It is a suitable tool for assessing ergonomic knowledge among computer users. Further refinement is recommended by expanding item content and diversifying the study population to enhance construct coverage.

Scientific Reports
Kashan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Validation of the Persian version of the computer ergonomics knowledge assessment questionnaire among frequent computer users — Mohammad Javad Azadchehr, Elaheh Mianehsaz, et al. · Scientific Reports (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS