A numerical Optimization of an Evaporative in HDH Desalination System: A Comparative Analysis of ADMM and Quadratic Programming

Evaporative systems play a crucial role in various industrial and environmental applications, offering energy-efficient cooling and humidification solutions. Optimizing these systems can significantly improve their performance and sustainability. This study compares the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (ADMM) and Quadratic Programming (QP) for optimizing key parameters in an evaporative system, including heat exchanger dimensions, airflow rates, water distribution, and operating temperatures. Results highlight the effectiveness of ADMM in managing complex, multi-variable constrained optimization problems, while QP provides faster convergence for specific quadratic formulations. The QP method ensures accuracy, whereas ADMM offers flexibility in handling real-world constraints. This research aims to provide insights into selecting the most suitable optimization techniques for enhancing evaporative system design and efficiency

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2026-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202669904001/pdf
Primary Topic
Solar-Powered Water Purification Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A numerical Optimization of an Evaporative in HDH Desalination System: A Comparative Analysis of ADMM and Quadratic Programming

Ibtissam El Aouni, Driss Zejli, Hamza Benzzine, Rachid El Bouayadi et al.
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Solar-Powered Water Purification Methods
article

A numerical Optimization of an Evaporative in HDH Desalination System: A Comparative Analysis of ADMM and Quadratic Programming

Ibtissam El Aouni, Driss Zejli, Hamza Benzzine, Rachid El Bouayadi, Aouatif Saad, Hichama Labrim
article en

Abstract

Evaporative systems play a crucial role in various industrial and environmental applications, offering energy-efficient cooling and humidification solutions. Optimizing these systems can significantly improve their performance and sustainability. This study compares the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (ADMM) and Quadratic Programming (QP) for optimizing key parameters in an evaporative system, including heat exchanger dimensions, airflow rates, water distribution, and operating temperatures. Results highlight the effectiveness of ADMM in managing complex, multi-variable constrained optimization problems, while QP provides faster convergence for specific quadratic formulations. The QP method ensures accuracy, whereas ADMM offers flexibility in handling real-world constraints. This research aims to provide insights into selecting the most suitable optimization techniques for enhancing evaporative system design and efficiency

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Solar-Powered Water Purification Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A numerical Optimization of an Evaporative in HDH Desalination System: A Comparative Analysis of ADMM and Quadratic Programming — Ibtissam El Aouni, Driss Zejli, et al. · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS