Severe Obesity Management in a Large Academic Health System: A Retrospective Evaluation of Metabolic Bariatric Surgery Counselling Practices

Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is an effective treatment for severe obesity but remains substantially underutilized. Limited data exist on outpatient counselling patterns preceding surgical uptake. Using electronic health record data, we conducted a 10-year retrospective cohort study of adults with body mass index ≥ 40 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. The primary outcome was documentation of the MBS discussion. Secondary outcomes included MBS receipt and demographic factors associated with documented discussion. Among 60 574 eligible patients, only 7.6% had documented MBS discussion. Overall, 1.2% underwent MBS. Surgery occurred in 12.1% of patients with documented discussion compared with 0.3% without discussion. Patients with documented discussion were younger (median, 42 vs. 47 years), had higher BMI (median, 46.8 vs. 42.0 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), and were more often female. Eligible women were more likely than men to have documented discussion (8.7% vs. 5.5%). Black patients had higher discussion rates than White patients, despite known downstream disparities in MBS utilization. Documented MBS discussion is rare but represents a critical inflection point in surgical uptake. Demographic differences in counselling suggest clinician- and system-level factors influence access before referral, highlighting outpatient counselling as a key target to improve equitable MBS utilization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Obesity
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cob.70077
Primary Topic
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Severe Obesity Management in a Large Academic Health System: A Retrospective Evaluation of Metabolic Bariatric Surgery Counselling Practices

Elizabeth Gienger, A. Lindsay Frazier, Mustafa Naveed, Tonja Locklear et al.
Clinical Obesity
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
article

Severe Obesity Management in a Large Academic Health System: A Retrospective Evaluation of Metabolic Bariatric Surgery Counselling Practices

Elizabeth Gienger, A. Lindsay Frazier, Mustafa Naveed, Tonja Locklear, Robert Carpenter
article en

Abstract

Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is an effective treatment for severe obesity but remains substantially underutilized. Limited data exist on outpatient counselling patterns preceding surgical uptake. Using electronic health record data, we conducted a 10-year retrospective cohort study of adults with body mass index ≥ 40 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. The primary outcome was documentation of the MBS discussion. Secondary outcomes included MBS receipt and demographic factors associated with documented discussion. Among 60 574 eligible patients, only 7.6% had documented MBS discussion. Overall, 1.2% underwent MBS. Surgery occurred in 12.1% of patients with documented discussion compared with 0.3% without discussion. Patients with documented discussion were younger (median, 42 vs. 47 years), had higher BMI (median, 46.8 vs. 42.0 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), and were more often female. Eligible women were more likely than men to have documented discussion (8.7% vs. 5.5%). Black patients had higher discussion rates than White patients, despite known downstream disparities in MBS utilization. Documented MBS discussion is rare but represents a critical inflection point in surgical uptake. Demographic differences in counselling suggest clinician- and system-level factors influence access before referral, highlighting outpatient counselling as a key target to improve equitable MBS utilization.

Clinical ObesityVol. 16(2)
Carilion Clinic (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.