Reporting Standards and Quality Assurance Methods for Pancreatoduodenectomy in Randomised Controlled Trials: A Structured Narrative Review

<b>Background:</b> Surgical interventions are complex and comprise multiple components, creating difficulties when considering how they might be described, standardised, and monitored (i.e., quality assurance) within randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials - Non-Pharmacological Treatment (CONSORT-NPT) provides specific recommendations to improve the quality, transparency, and replicability of RCTs involving a surgical intervention. This structured narrative review explores and summarizes the reporting of quality assurance measures for surgical interventions in RCTs, using pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) as an exploratory case study. <b>Methods:</b> Searches for RCTs of PD were undertaken in PubMed, Medline, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from 2020 to 2024. Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) was deconstructed into its constituent components (<i>n</i> = 40), and selected RCTs were scrutinised to explore reporting of quality assurance measures against the deconstructed components as described in CONSORT-NPT. <b>Results:</b> Of 189 screened articles, 37 RCTs were included, reporting on 5659 patients across 16 countries. No studies described all components of PD, and four did not report any components at all. Nine studies described some form of standardisation, and three measured adherence to standards, using intra-operative photographs. Minimum surgeon and centre volumes were specified in two and six trials, respectively. <b>Conclusions:</b> Quality assurance measures were poorly reported in selected RCTs involving PD, creating uncertainty in interpreting results. To enhance the design of future RCTs, a wider consensus regarding the core components of a PD is required. This will facilitate subsequent consideration of how these might need to be reported in future pancreatic surgical RCTs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15062455
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reporting Standards and Quality Assurance Methods for Pancreatoduodenectomy in Randomised Controlled Trials: A Structured Narrative Review

Deborah D. Stocken, Bishow Karki, Balaji Mahendran, Natalie Blencowe et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

Reporting Standards and Quality Assurance Methods for Pancreatoduodenectomy in Randomised Controlled Trials: A Structured Narrative Review

Deborah D. Stocken, Bishow Karki, Balaji Mahendran, Natalie Blencowe, John Moir, Abdullah Malik, Audrey D. Smith, Samir Pathak, Shailesh V. Shrikhande
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Surgical interventions are complex and comprise multiple components, creating difficulties when considering how they might be described, standardised, and monitored (i.e., quality assurance) within randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials - Non-Pharmacological Treatment (CONSORT-NPT) provides specific recommendations to improve the quality, transparency, and replicability of RCTs involving a surgical intervention. This structured narrative review explores and summarizes the reporting of quality assurance measures for surgical interventions in RCTs, using pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) as an exploratory case study. <b>Methods:</b> Searches for RCTs of PD were undertaken in PubMed, Medline, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from 2020 to 2024. Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) was deconstructed into its constituent components (<i>n</i> = 40), and selected RCTs were scrutinised to explore reporting of quality assurance measures against the deconstructed components as described in CONSORT-NPT. <b>Results:</b> Of 189 screened articles, 37 RCTs were included, reporting on 5659 patients across 16 countries. No studies described all components of PD, and four did not report any components at all. Nine studies described some form of standardisation, and three measured adherence to standards, using intra-operative photographs. Minimum surgeon and centre volumes were specified in two and six trials, respectively. <b>Conclusions:</b> Quality assurance measures were poorly reported in selected RCTs involving PD, creating uncertainty in interpreting results. To enhance the design of future RCTs, a wider consensus regarding the core components of a PD is required. This will facilitate subsequent consideration of how these might need to be reported in future pancreatic surgical RCTs.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(6)
University of Leeds (GB), Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), Tata Memorial Hospital (IN), At Bristol (GB), Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre (GB), Newcastle University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.