The History of and Advances in Newborn Screening: Where Do We Stand?

To comprehend the current state and future of newborn screening (NBS), it is essential to understand its history. Over the past six decades, this well-established and exemplary population-based screening program has been guided by screening principles dating back more than half a century. Advances in laboratory and point-of-care testing, diagnostic methods, and a surge of available treatments and even cures have made it challenging to balance screening criteria that have not kept pace with the current landscape. The availability to screen as well as the demand from parents and stakeholders to screen for more and increasingly complex conditions while limiting the retention of NBS specimens and genetic material has been both exciting and challenging. This paper shares the history of NBS in the United States, followed by the development and integration of genomic sequencing as a complement to current practice. It explores evidence supporting the concomitant use of biomarker- and DNA-sequencing-based approaches for NBS, how disorders are selected for inclusion, and available treatments, and offers recommendations regarding what to consider and how to proceed in this ever-changing NBS landscape.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Genes
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/genes17030359
Primary Topic
Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The History of and Advances in Newborn Screening: Where Do We Stand?

Milen Velinov, Sharon Anderson
Genes
Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
article

The History of and Advances in Newborn Screening: Where Do We Stand?

Milen Velinov, Sharon Anderson
article en

Abstract

To comprehend the current state and future of newborn screening (NBS), it is essential to understand its history. Over the past six decades, this well-established and exemplary population-based screening program has been guided by screening principles dating back more than half a century. Advances in laboratory and point-of-care testing, diagnostic methods, and a surge of available treatments and even cures have made it challenging to balance screening criteria that have not kept pace with the current landscape. The availability to screen as well as the demand from parents and stakeholders to screen for more and increasingly complex conditions while limiting the retention of NBS specimens and genetic material has been both exciting and challenging. This paper shares the history of NBS in the United States, followed by the development and integration of genomic sequencing as a complement to current practice. It explores evidence supporting the concomitant use of biomarker- and DNA-sequencing-based approaches for NBS, how disorders are selected for inclusion, and available treatments, and offers recommendations regarding what to consider and how to proceed in this ever-changing NBS landscape.

GenesVol. 17(3)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Johnson University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.