An exercise in the prioritization of patient experience dimensions: What is important and for whom? A resource allocation simulation

IntroductionPatient experience (PX) is now recognized as the third pillar of healthcare quality, with evidences linking PX dimensions to improved clinical outcomes. As health systems shift toward value-based care, understanding which aspects of care citizens value most is essential for aligning services with their expectations and improving health outcomes.MethodologyThis study explores how citizens (n = 78; 29 men, 49 women) prioritize PX dimensions, through a simulation conducted during an open day at a University Hospital. Participants at the PX team's outreach stand received information on seven PX dimensions-Information, Therapeutic education, Physical environment, Participation in service governance, Shared decision-making, Professional accessibility, and Respectful treatment-identified through literature and over 70 focus groups. Each was asked to allocate a simulated 500€ budget across these dimensions using play money. Color-coded envelopes were distributed based on gender identity.ResultsParticipants prioritized Professional accessibility (22%), followed by Therapeutic education (17%) and Respectful treatment (17%). Shared decision-making (12%), Information (11%), Participation (11%), and Physical environment (10%) followed. Gender differences were observed: while both men and women placed highest value on Professional accessibility (21%), men favoured Therapeutic education (19% vs 16%), while women prioritized Respectful treatment (18% vs 14%).ConclusionsThese findings highlight the potential of participatory approaches to reveal citizens' true priorities, informing more targeted, equitable, and people-centred strategies. By aligning PX improvements with dimensions citizens value most, particularly accessibility, education, and respectful care, healthcare systems can enhance both responsiveness and overall quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Services Management Research
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09514848261435936
Primary Topic
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An exercise in the prioritization of patient experience dimensions: What is important and for whom? A resource allocation simulation

Begoña Ruiz Ibáñez, Brittany Taylor, Rosario Scandurra, Joan Fernando et al.
Health Services Management Research
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
article

An exercise in the prioritization of patient experience dimensions: What is important and for whom? A resource allocation simulation

Begoña Ruiz Ibáñez, Brittany Taylor, Rosario Scandurra, Joan Fernando, Anne-Sophie Gresle, Eva Palou, O. Rubio, J. Farré, Joan Escarrabill
article en

Abstract

IntroductionPatient experience (PX) is now recognized as the third pillar of healthcare quality, with evidences linking PX dimensions to improved clinical outcomes. As health systems shift toward value-based care, understanding which aspects of care citizens value most is essential for aligning services with their expectations and improving health outcomes.MethodologyThis study explores how citizens (n = 78; 29 men, 49 women) prioritize PX dimensions, through a simulation conducted during an open day at a University Hospital. Participants at the PX team's outreach stand received information on seven PX dimensions-Information, Therapeutic education, Physical environment, Participation in service governance, Shared decision-making, Professional accessibility, and Respectful treatment-identified through literature and over 70 focus groups. Each was asked to allocate a simulated 500€ budget across these dimensions using play money. Color-coded envelopes were distributed based on gender identity.ResultsParticipants prioritized Professional accessibility (22%), followed by Therapeutic education (17%) and Respectful treatment (17%). Shared decision-making (12%), Information (11%), Participation (11%), and Physical environment (10%) followed. Gender differences were observed: while both men and women placed highest value on Professional accessibility (21%), men favoured Therapeutic education (19% vs 16%), while women prioritized Respectful treatment (18% vs 14%).ConclusionsThese findings highlight the potential of participatory approaches to reveal citizens' true priorities, informing more targeted, equitable, and people-centred strategies. By aligning PX improvements with dimensions citizens value most, particularly accessibility, education, and respectful care, healthcare systems can enhance both responsiveness and overall quality.

Health Services Management Research
Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES), Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ES), Fundació Clínic per a la Recerca Biomèdica (ES), Consorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer (ES), Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.