Beneath the surface: the overlooked subtidal reef‐building oysters of the east coast of Australia

Molecular and morphological evidence has reshaped our understanding of oyster diversity, distributions and phylogeny, revealing widespread misidentifications and undescribed species. On Australia's east coast the Sydney rock oyster, Saccostrea glomerata , traditionally thought to be reef‐building both intertidally and subtidally, is likely a predominantly intertidal species. Examination of museum specimens and historical literature indicates that subtidal S. glomerata identifications are likely incorrect and instead represent multiple species, all with reef‐building capacity. Broadly, clarifying species identities and distributions by tidal zone and depth will be an essential first step for guiding subtidal oyster reef restoration in tropical and subtropical areas. Given this re‐interpretation, the threatened status of S. glomerata reefs should be re‐assessed to reflect their true, predominantly intertidal distribution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Restoration Ecology
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.70382
Primary Topic
Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beneath the surface: the overlooked subtidal reef‐building oysters of the east coast of Australia

Carmel McDougall, Marina A. Richardson, Adam Boyle, Nikolina Nenadic et al.
Restoration Ecology
Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies
article

Beneath the surface: the overlooked subtidal reef‐building oysters of the east coast of Australia

Carmel McDougall, Marina A. Richardson, Adam Boyle, Nikolina Nenadic, John H. Healy, Rod M. Connolly
article en

Abstract

Molecular and morphological evidence has reshaped our understanding of oyster diversity, distributions and phylogeny, revealing widespread misidentifications and undescribed species. On Australia's east coast the Sydney rock oyster, Saccostrea glomerata , traditionally thought to be reef‐building both intertidally and subtidally, is likely a predominantly intertidal species. Examination of museum specimens and historical literature indicates that subtidal S. glomerata identifications are likely incorrect and instead represent multiple species, all with reef‐building capacity. Broadly, clarifying species identities and distributions by tidal zone and depth will be an essential first step for guiding subtidal oyster reef restoration in tropical and subtropical areas. Given this re‐interpretation, the threatened status of S. glomerata reefs should be re‐assessed to reflect their true, predominantly intertidal distribution.

Restoration Ecology
Griffith University (AU), University of St Andrews (GB), Queensland Museum (AU), Field Museum of Natural History (US)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Beneath the surface: the overlooked subtidal reef‐building oysters of the east coast of Australia — Carmel McDougall, Marina A. Richardson, et al. · Restoration Ecology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS