THE MODAL DISCIPLINE OF SPIRAL TIME: a critical–propositional analysis of the dossier From the Perfect Logical Sphere to Spiral Time, by Marcel Krüger, in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity

This article offers a critical–propositional examination of Marcel Krüger’s dossier From the Perfect Logical Sphere to Spiral Time: A Synthesis Dossier between the Helix–Light–Vortex Framework and the Theory of Objectivity, placing it in direct confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity (TO). The study investigates whether the Helix–Light–Vortex (HLV) framework can be received, under modal discipline, as a derived geometrical-dynamical language compatible with the logical and ontological foundations of TO. The paper argues that Krüger’s dossier is a relevant and fertile contribution to contemporary cosmological and ontological debate because it seeks to connect the Perfect Logical Sphere, spiral time, quasicrystalline structures, vortical dynamics, and informational fields within a unified synthesis. At the same time, the article maintains that such a synthesis can only be accepted if the primacy of the Perfect Logical Sphere, the Seven Absolute Axioms, and the cosmogonic theorem of TO is fully preserved. The analysis examines the proposed correspondences between TO and HLV in detail, including the relation between the Perfect Logical Sphere and spiral-time geometry, the comparison between TO’s axioms and HLV structures, the mapping of TO’s cosmological eras onto HLV spiral regimes, and the question of empirical testability. Special emphasis is given to the interpretation of the transcendent element as knowledge or information produced in atomic relations and equivalent to atomic radiations, which allows a particularly fruitful dialogue with the informational field in the HLV framework. The article concludes that Krüger’s proposal should not be understood as a replacement for the Theory of Objectivity, but rather as a possible phenomenological and geometrical translation of some of its derived regimes. In this sense, the paper defends a disciplined reading in which TO remains the logical and ontological foundation, while HLV may function as a secondary descriptive language for cosmological, informational, and dynamical manifestation. Keywords: Theory of Objectivity; Marcel Krüger; Helix–Light–Vortex; Perfect Logical Sphere; spiral time; modal ontology; cosmology; quasicrystals; information; phenomenology; testability; ontological discipline.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19191078
Primary Topic
Earth Systems and Cosmic Evolution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE MODAL DISCIPLINE OF SPIRAL TIME: a critical–propositional analysis of the dossier From the Perfect Logical Sphere to Spiral Time, by Marcel Krüger, in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity

Denivaldo Silva, Vidamor Cabannas
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Earth Systems and Cosmic Evolution
article

THE MODAL DISCIPLINE OF SPIRAL TIME: a critical–propositional analysis of the dossier From the Perfect Logical Sphere to Spiral Time, by Marcel Krüger, in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity

Denivaldo Silva, Vidamor Cabannas
article en

Abstract

This article offers a critical–propositional examination of Marcel Krüger’s dossier From the Perfect Logical Sphere to Spiral Time: A Synthesis Dossier between the Helix–Light–Vortex Framework and the Theory of Objectivity, placing it in direct confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity (TO). The study investigates whether the Helix–Light–Vortex (HLV) framework can be received, under modal discipline, as a derived geometrical-dynamical language compatible with the logical and ontological foundations of TO. The paper argues that Krüger’s dossier is a relevant and fertile contribution to contemporary cosmological and ontological debate because it seeks to connect the Perfect Logical Sphere, spiral time, quasicrystalline structures, vortical dynamics, and informational fields within a unified synthesis. At the same time, the article maintains that such a synthesis can only be accepted if the primacy of the Perfect Logical Sphere, the Seven Absolute Axioms, and the cosmogonic theorem of TO is fully preserved. The analysis examines the proposed correspondences between TO and HLV in detail, including the relation between the Perfect Logical Sphere and spiral-time geometry, the comparison between TO’s axioms and HLV structures, the mapping of TO’s cosmological eras onto HLV spiral regimes, and the question of empirical testability. Special emphasis is given to the interpretation of the transcendent element as knowledge or information produced in atomic relations and equivalent to atomic radiations, which allows a particularly fruitful dialogue with the informational field in the HLV framework. The article concludes that Krüger’s proposal should not be understood as a replacement for the Theory of Objectivity, but rather as a possible phenomenological and geometrical translation of some of its derived regimes. In this sense, the paper defends a disciplined reading in which TO remains the logical and ontological foundation, while HLV may function as a secondary descriptive language for cosmological, informational, and dynamical manifestation. Keywords: Theory of Objectivity; Marcel Krüger; Helix–Light–Vortex; Perfect Logical Sphere; spiral time; modal ontology; cosmology; quasicrystals; information; phenomenology; testability; ontological discipline.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Earth Systems and Cosmic Evolution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.