Urban Design Between Artefact and Process. An open disciplinary reflection, seventy years after the Harvard Urban Design Conference (1956-2026). [Reflection Node #1 | Research Notebook Series, No. 04]

This reflection departs from the methodological tone of the Research Notebook Series to articulate a situated disciplinary position within architecture and urban design. Seventy years after the Harvard Urban Design Conference (1956), it returns to a recurring question: what counts as urban design competence? Through this reflection, two enduring orientations within the discipline come into view—urban design as artefact production and as relational practice—framing process as a medium of design. Urban design emerges as a plural discipline that operates through the interplay of artefacts and processes, engaging socio-spatial complexity through their relation. Competence takes shape through the capacity to work across these dimensions, shaping spatial outcomes through both form and the organisation of relations. This work is part of the Research Notebook Series (n.4), a structured and evolving body of research in architecture and urban design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19096858
Primary Topic
Urban Planning and Landscape Design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Urban Design Between Artefact and Process. An open disciplinary reflection, seventy years after the Harvard Urban Design Conference (1956-2026). [Reflection Node #1 | Research Notebook Series, No. 04]

Deborah Navarra
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Urban Planning and Landscape Design
article

Urban Design Between Artefact and Process. An open disciplinary reflection, seventy years after the Harvard Urban Design Conference (1956-2026). [Reflection Node #1 | Research Notebook Series, No. 04]

Deborah Navarra
article en

Abstract

This reflection departs from the methodological tone of the Research Notebook Series to articulate a situated disciplinary position within architecture and urban design. Seventy years after the Harvard Urban Design Conference (1956), it returns to a recurring question: what counts as urban design competence? Through this reflection, two enduring orientations within the discipline come into view—urban design as artefact production and as relational practice—framing process as a medium of design. Urban design emerges as a plural discipline that operates through the interplay of artefacts and processes, engaging socio-spatial complexity through their relation. Competence takes shape through the capacity to work across these dimensions, shaping spatial outcomes through both form and the organisation of relations. This work is part of the Research Notebook Series (n.4), a structured and evolving body of research in architecture and urban design.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Urban Planning and Landscape Design
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.