Frequency-Domain Rotor and Propeller Tonal Noise Models: Analytical Framework and Prediction Accuracy

Frequency-domain tonal noise prediction models provide a rapid means of assessing rotational noise, which is particularly useful during the early stages of rotorcraft and propeller design and optimization. This paper presents a comprehensive review of the most widely used frequency-domain models, including four steady loading noise models, three unsteady loading noise models, and three thickness noise models. Unified and consistent formulations are provided for all models, and the contributions of individual terms are grouped and analyzed. The models are then compared under various operating conditions, including steady hover, unsteady hover, axial forward flight, and edgewise forward flight. Overall, the models show good agreement with measurement data, although certain deficiencies have also been identified. Finally, recommendations for model usage under different flight conditions are provided.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AIAA Journal
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j066263
Primary Topic
Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Frequency-Domain Rotor and Propeller Tonal Noise Models: Analytical Framework and Prediction Accuracy

Seongkyu Lee, Hyunjune Gill
AIAA Journal
Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows
article

Frequency-Domain Rotor and Propeller Tonal Noise Models: Analytical Framework and Prediction Accuracy

Seongkyu Lee, Hyunjune Gill
article en

Abstract

Frequency-domain tonal noise prediction models provide a rapid means of assessing rotational noise, which is particularly useful during the early stages of rotorcraft and propeller design and optimization. This paper presents a comprehensive review of the most widely used frequency-domain models, including four steady loading noise models, three unsteady loading noise models, and three thickness noise models. Unified and consistent formulations are provided for all models, and the contributions of individual terms are grouped and analyzed. The models are then compared under various operating conditions, including steady hover, unsteady hover, axial forward flight, and edgewise forward flight. Overall, the models show good agreement with measurement data, although certain deficiencies have also been identified. Finally, recommendations for model usage under different flight conditions are provided.

AIAA Journal
University of California System (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.