Cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Gastrointestinal Unhelpful Thinking Scale

Background Gastrointestinal symptoms are often influenced by cognitive and emotional factors. The Gastrointestinal Unhelpful Thinking Scale (GUTs) was developed to assess such cognition in patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders. However, no validated Chinese version exists by now. Aim To conduct translation, cultural adaption and psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the GUTs amongst patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Methods Following the Brislin translation model for cross-cultural adaptation, we recruited 212 IBS patients from a tertiary hospital in Shanghai using convenience sampling. The validation process included assessment of content validity, construct validity and reliability. Results The Chinese GUTs demonstrated excellent content validity, with the content validity level and the average level of scale being 0.80 and 0.987, respectively. Exploratory factor analysis verified the original two-factor structure (pain catastrophizing and visceral sensitivity), accounting for 66.240% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated the model fit was acceptable (χ 2 /df = 2.991, CFI = 0.853, RMSEA = 0.038). The scale demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.947) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.844). Spearman-Brown coefficient was 0.912, and considered as strong split-half reliability. Conclusion The translated GUTs shows robust psychometric properties and is a valid, reliable scale for assessing gastrointestinal-specific unhelpful thinking patterns in Chinese IBS patients, suitable for clinical applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Medicine
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1807329
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Gastrointestinal Unhelpful Thinking Scale

Changqin Xu, Huiren Zhuang, Lili Ma, Weiqin Huang et al.
Frontiers in Medicine
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
article

Cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Gastrointestinal Unhelpful Thinking Scale

Changqin Xu, Huiren Zhuang, Lili Ma, Weiqin Huang, Yaocheng Shi
article en

Abstract

Background Gastrointestinal symptoms are often influenced by cognitive and emotional factors. The Gastrointestinal Unhelpful Thinking Scale (GUTs) was developed to assess such cognition in patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders. However, no validated Chinese version exists by now. Aim To conduct translation, cultural adaption and psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the GUTs amongst patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Methods Following the Brislin translation model for cross-cultural adaptation, we recruited 212 IBS patients from a tertiary hospital in Shanghai using convenience sampling. The validation process included assessment of content validity, construct validity and reliability. Results The Chinese GUTs demonstrated excellent content validity, with the content validity level and the average level of scale being 0.80 and 0.987, respectively. Exploratory factor analysis verified the original two-factor structure (pain catastrophizing and visceral sensitivity), accounting for 66.240% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated the model fit was acceptable (χ 2 /df = 2.991, CFI = 0.853, RMSEA = 0.038). The scale demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.947) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.844). Spearman-Brown coefficient was 0.912, and considered as strong split-half reliability. Conclusion The translated GUTs shows robust psychometric properties and is a valid, reliable scale for assessing gastrointestinal-specific unhelpful thinking patterns in Chinese IBS patients, suitable for clinical applications.

Frontiers in MedicineVol. 13
Shanghai East Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Gastrointestinal Unhelpful Thinking Scale — Changqin Xu, Huiren Zhuang, et al. · Frontiers in Medicine (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS