Simultaneous analysis of various anticancer drugs by supercritical fluid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Part II: Method validation and comparison with liquid chromatography

A complete SFC-MS/MS method validation enabling the simultaneous trace-level analysis of 27 conventional anticancer drugs (CADs) was performed. The selected drugs were the following: 5-fluorouracil, azacitidine, busulfan, carboplatin, cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, dacarbazine, daunorubicin, docetaxel, doxorubicin, epirubicin, etoposide, gemcitabine, idarubicin, ifosfamide, irinotecan, methotrexate, mitomycin, oxaliplatin, paclitaxel, pemetrexed, raltitrexed, topotecan, treosulfan, vinblastine and vincristine. Accuracy profiles were obtained for all CADs. Trueness ranged between 71.0% and 119.8%, while repeatability (1.3-17.5%) and intermediate precision (2.0-24.9%) were determined for all compounds, with limits of quantification comprised between 0.1 and 25 ng.mL -1 . These results were systematically compared with those obtained during the validation of a reference UHPLC-MS/MS method routinely used to analyze 25 of the 27 CADs contained in samples collected from work surfaces in a hospital pharmacy chemotherapy compounding unit. SFC-MS/MS method offered greater accuracy but was hampered by lower precision than the UHPLC-MS/MS method for most of the compounds. Furthermore, although the developed SFC-MS/MS method was characterized by a lower sensitivity, it allowed the quantification of compounds that were difficult to analyze by UHPLC-MS/MS, such as azacitidine and cisplatin, with analytical performance comparable to that obtained for the other CADs analyzed. This feature highlights the complementarity of the two chromatographic approaches in the context of CAD determination in a hospital environment. • Analysis of 27 diverse anticancer drugs in SFC-MS/MS in a single run. • Validation of the optimized SFC-MS/MS method in an environmental surveillance context. • Comparison with an LC-MS/MS method routinely used in the same context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2026.117473
Primary Topic
Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Simultaneous analysis of various anticancer drugs by supercritical fluid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Part II: Method validation and comparison with liquid chromatography

Davy Guillarme, Pascal Bonnabry, Sandrine Fleury-Souverain, Serge Rudaz et al.
Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis
Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
article

Simultaneous analysis of various anticancer drugs by supercritical fluid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Part II: Method validation and comparison with liquid chromatography

Davy Guillarme, Pascal Bonnabry, Sandrine Fleury-Souverain, Serge Rudaz, Nathalie Nguyen, Vallet Virginie
article en

Abstract

A complete SFC-MS/MS method validation enabling the simultaneous trace-level analysis of 27 conventional anticancer drugs (CADs) was performed. The selected drugs were the following: 5-fluorouracil, azacitidine, busulfan, carboplatin, cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, dacarbazine, daunorubicin, docetaxel, doxorubicin, epirubicin, etoposide, gemcitabine, idarubicin, ifosfamide, irinotecan, methotrexate, mitomycin, oxaliplatin, paclitaxel, pemetrexed, raltitrexed, topotecan, treosulfan, vinblastine and vincristine. Accuracy profiles were obtained for all CADs. Trueness ranged between 71.0% and 119.8%, while repeatability (1.3-17.5%) and intermediate precision (2.0-24.9%) were determined for all compounds, with limits of quantification comprised between 0.1 and 25 ng.mL -1 . These results were systematically compared with those obtained during the validation of a reference UHPLC-MS/MS method routinely used to analyze 25 of the 27 CADs contained in samples collected from work surfaces in a hospital pharmacy chemotherapy compounding unit. SFC-MS/MS method offered greater accuracy but was hampered by lower precision than the UHPLC-MS/MS method for most of the compounds. Furthermore, although the developed SFC-MS/MS method was characterized by a lower sensitivity, it allowed the quantification of compounds that were difficult to analyze by UHPLC-MS/MS, such as azacitidine and cisplatin, with analytical performance comparable to that obtained for the other CADs analyzed. This feature highlights the complementarity of the two chromatographic approaches in the context of CAD determination in a hospital environment. • Analysis of 27 diverse anticancer drugs in SFC-MS/MS in a single run. • Validation of the optimized SFC-MS/MS method in an environmental surveillance context. • Comparison with an LC-MS/MS method routinely used in the same context.

Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical AnalysisVol. 276
University of Geneva (CH), Ono Pharmaceutical (United States) (US), University Hospital of Geneva (CH)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.