Macroeconomic modeling of water resources: Conceptual and methodological challenges in CGE frameworks

Water scarcity is increasingly recognized as a systemic economic constraint, with impacts that extend far beyond directly water-using sectors. Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) models constitute a powerful tool for capturing the indirect and structural effects of water scarcity across interconnected markets, yet their application to water resources poses distinctive conceptual, methodological, and data challenges. This paper reviews how water has been conceptualized and operationalized within CGE models, focusing on the treatment of water scarcity, allocation mechanisms, and economic valuation under conditions characterized by weak or missing price signals. Rather than providing an exhaustive catalogue of applications, the analysis compares alternative modelling strategies—embedding water in land, treating water as an independent production factor, representing water implicitly through productivity effects, and modelling water as a produced commodity—highlighting their respective advantages, limitations, and suitability for different policy questions. The review shows that no single approach dominates across contexts: implicit representations are often sufficient for climate-impact assessments, whereas explicit formulations are required to analyse water markets, allocation rules, and infrastructure investments. A central challenge across all approaches is the fundamentally non-market nature of water, which complicates calibration, pricing, and the interpretation of economic rents. Additional difficulties arise from spatial and temporal heterogeneity, basin-level constraints, return flows, and water quality differentiation, which standard CGE structures struggle to represent. The paper also shortly discusses recent advances in hybrid modelling frameworks that couple CGE models with hydro-economic models (HEMs). The paper concludes by outlining key directions for future research, emphasizing the need for improved water accounts, dynamic and seasonal modelling, and closer integration between economic and hydrological modelling communities.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Water
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pwat.0000529
Primary Topic
Water resources management and optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Macroeconomic modeling of water resources: Conceptual and methodological challenges in CGE frameworks

Martina Sartori, Roberto Roson
PLOS Water
Water resources management and optimization
article

Macroeconomic modeling of water resources: Conceptual and methodological challenges in CGE frameworks

Martina Sartori, Roberto Roson
article en

Abstract

Water scarcity is increasingly recognized as a systemic economic constraint, with impacts that extend far beyond directly water-using sectors. Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) models constitute a powerful tool for capturing the indirect and structural effects of water scarcity across interconnected markets, yet their application to water resources poses distinctive conceptual, methodological, and data challenges. This paper reviews how water has been conceptualized and operationalized within CGE models, focusing on the treatment of water scarcity, allocation mechanisms, and economic valuation under conditions characterized by weak or missing price signals. Rather than providing an exhaustive catalogue of applications, the analysis compares alternative modelling strategies—embedding water in land, treating water as an independent production factor, representing water implicitly through productivity effects, and modelling water as a produced commodity—highlighting their respective advantages, limitations, and suitability for different policy questions. The review shows that no single approach dominates across contexts: implicit representations are often sufficient for climate-impact assessments, whereas explicit formulations are required to analyse water markets, allocation rules, and infrastructure investments. A central challenge across all approaches is the fundamentally non-market nature of water, which complicates calibration, pricing, and the interpretation of economic rents. Additional difficulties arise from spatial and temporal heterogeneity, basin-level constraints, return flows, and water quality differentiation, which standard CGE structures struggle to represent. The paper also shortly discusses recent advances in hybrid modelling frameworks that couple CGE models with hydro-economic models (HEMs). The paper concludes by outlining key directions for future research, emphasizing the need for improved water accounts, dynamic and seasonal modelling, and closer integration between economic and hydrological modelling communities.

PLOS WaterVol. 5(3)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Water resources management and optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Macroeconomic modeling of water resources: Conceptual and methodological challenges in CGE frameworks — Martina Sartori, Roberto Roson · PLOS Water (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS