Symptom profiles and psychosocial features in atypical depression:A comparative study

Background: Atypical depression (AD) has been proposed to be a specific subtype of major depressive disorder (MDD) that differs to other subtypes in symptom profiles and potentially in biological and psychosocial features. Relative to other subtypes, such as melancholic MDD (MEL), AD remains underexplored, particularly concerning psychosocial factors. This study aimed to examine psychosocial features in individuals reporting AD symptoms, in comparison to other MDD presentations. We also sought to assess whether specific features relate to functioning within each subgroup.<br/>Methods: 98 participants meeting DSM criteria for MDD were recruited including those with AD (n=36), MEL (n=37), or mixed/unspecified features (n=25, u-MDD). Participants completed self-report measures assessing depressive symptoms, anxiety, bipolar traits, somatic symptoms, trauma history, rejection sensitivity, personality traits, emotion regulation, coping, illness perceptions, quality of life, and functional impairment. <br/>Results: Of twelve pre-specified hypotheses, only one was supported. AD was distinguished from MEL by higher rejection sensitivity (p = .025), while no group differences were observed for anxiety, somatic symptoms, trauma exposure, emotion regulation, coping, personality traits, functioning, or quality of life. AD and MEL did not differ in overall depressive severity. Individuals with u-MDD reported lower symptom severity and less perceived illness impact. <br/>Conclusions: The findings indicate that AD was not associated with greater overall psychosocial burden than MEL. Instead, rejection sensitivity emerged as the primary feature distinguishing AD from other depressive presentations. The substantial overlap observed across most psychosocial domains suggests that differences between depressive subtypes may be narrower and more specific than previously proposed. <br/>

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Research Portal (King's College London)
Published
2026-03-13
Primary Topic
Treatment of Major Depression
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Symptom profiles and psychosocial features in atypical depression:A comparative study

Jessica Davies, Lauren Blunstone, Mario F; id_orcid 0000-0001-8558-3396 Juruena, Susannah; id_orcid 0000-0003-2001-6723 Pick et al.
Research Portal (King's College London)
Treatment of Major Depression
article

Symptom profiles and psychosocial features in atypical depression:A comparative study

Jessica Davies, Lauren Blunstone, Mario F; id_orcid 0000-0001-8558-3396 Juruena, Susannah; id_orcid 0000-0003-2001-6723 Pick, Ruxandra Iona Toma
article en

Abstract

Background: Atypical depression (AD) has been proposed to be a specific subtype of major depressive disorder (MDD) that differs to other subtypes in symptom profiles and potentially in biological and psychosocial features. Relative to other subtypes, such as melancholic MDD (MEL), AD remains underexplored, particularly concerning psychosocial factors. This study aimed to examine psychosocial features in individuals reporting AD symptoms, in comparison to other MDD presentations. We also sought to assess whether specific features relate to functioning within each subgroup.<br/>Methods: 98 participants meeting DSM criteria for MDD were recruited including those with AD (n=36), MEL (n=37), or mixed/unspecified features (n=25, u-MDD). Participants completed self-report measures assessing depressive symptoms, anxiety, bipolar traits, somatic symptoms, trauma history, rejection sensitivity, personality traits, emotion regulation, coping, illness perceptions, quality of life, and functional impairment. <br/>Results: Of twelve pre-specified hypotheses, only one was supported. AD was distinguished from MEL by higher rejection sensitivity (p = .025), while no group differences were observed for anxiety, somatic symptoms, trauma exposure, emotion regulation, coping, personality traits, functioning, or quality of life. AD and MEL did not differ in overall depressive severity. Individuals with u-MDD reported lower symptom severity and less perceived illness impact. <br/>Conclusions: The findings indicate that AD was not associated with greater overall psychosocial burden than MEL. Instead, rejection sensitivity emerged as the primary feature distinguishing AD from other depressive presentations. The substantial overlap observed across most psychosocial domains suggests that differences between depressive subtypes may be narrower and more specific than previously proposed. <br/>

Research Portal (King's College London)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Treatment of Major Depression
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.