Feminists Resist Unrealistic Beauty Standards but Are Not Invulnerable to Their Negative Consequences

ABSTRACT Unrealistic beauty standards have negative effects on women's well‐being. Feminism can act as a protective barrier against these effects by promoting broader beauty standards and resistance to social/gender norms. However, such work often assumes that all feminists are alike. In contrast, a recent multiple identity perspective suggests that resistance to social norms in feminists is further qualified by their identification with women. In consequence, we explored how feminist identification and identification with women interact to predict reactions to idealised (vs. non‐idealised) beauty imagery. Participants ( N = 433) were shown idealised or non‐idealised beauty imagery and completed different body image measures (resistance, beliefs about beauty, body enhancement, etc.). In partial support of the multiple identity perspective, only ‘distinctive feminists’ (high feminist identification and low identification with women) adopted broader conceptualisations of beauty in reaction to idealised imagery. Additionally, feminist identification (regardless of identification with women) was predictive of participants' reactions to idealised images, such as emotional responses and motivation to challenge women's portrayals. However, we found no direct or qualified links between feminism and body image outcomes and body enhancement behaviours, suggesting that feminists' body image is affected by unrealistic beauty standards in the same way as non‐feminists'.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Social Psychology
Published
2026-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.70055
Primary Topic
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feminists Resist Unrealistic Beauty Standards but Are Not Invulnerable to Their Negative Consequences

Melissa Jayne Atkinson, Małgorzata A. Gocłowska, Joshua J. Tenn
Journal of Applied Social Psychology
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
article

Feminists Resist Unrealistic Beauty Standards but Are Not Invulnerable to Their Negative Consequences

Melissa Jayne Atkinson, Małgorzata A. Gocłowska, Joshua J. Tenn
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Unrealistic beauty standards have negative effects on women's well‐being. Feminism can act as a protective barrier against these effects by promoting broader beauty standards and resistance to social/gender norms. However, such work often assumes that all feminists are alike. In contrast, a recent multiple identity perspective suggests that resistance to social norms in feminists is further qualified by their identification with women. In consequence, we explored how feminist identification and identification with women interact to predict reactions to idealised (vs. non‐idealised) beauty imagery. Participants ( N = 433) were shown idealised or non‐idealised beauty imagery and completed different body image measures (resistance, beliefs about beauty, body enhancement, etc.). In partial support of the multiple identity perspective, only ‘distinctive feminists’ (high feminist identification and low identification with women) adopted broader conceptualisations of beauty in reaction to idealised imagery. Additionally, feminist identification (regardless of identification with women) was predictive of participants' reactions to idealised images, such as emotional responses and motivation to challenge women's portrayals. However, we found no direct or qualified links between feminism and body image outcomes and body enhancement behaviours, suggesting that feminists' body image is affected by unrealistic beauty standards in the same way as non‐feminists'.

Journal of Applied Social Psychology
University of Bath (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.