Thriving on poor soil? People’s attitudes towards deliberation in transition countries

Demand for and participation in deliberative practices have often been studied in democratic settings where they were available or took place. However, there is limited information about what shapes people’s attitudes towards deliberative practices in countries that struggle with representative democracy and where deliberation is not available. This article addresses these gaps in the literature and aims to explain why people in the Republic of Moldova support deliberative practices and would engage with them should they happen in their country. We draw on individual data from a survey conducted in November 2024 on a national representative sample. We isolate baseline orientations towards deliberation and find that most Moldovans have positive views about deliberation, but many support deliberation strongly without striving to engage. Support for deliberation is influenced by area of residence and gender, while the willingness to engage is the result of people’s attitudes towards politics and decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Contemporary Politics
Published
2026-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2026.2643585
Primary Topic
Social Capital and Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thriving on poor soil? People’s attitudes towards deliberation in transition countries

Paul Țap, Sergiu Gherghina
Contemporary Politics
Social Capital and Networks
article

Thriving on poor soil? People’s attitudes towards deliberation in transition countries

Paul Țap, Sergiu Gherghina
article en

Abstract

Demand for and participation in deliberative practices have often been studied in democratic settings where they were available or took place. However, there is limited information about what shapes people’s attitudes towards deliberative practices in countries that struggle with representative democracy and where deliberation is not available. This article addresses these gaps in the literature and aims to explain why people in the Republic of Moldova support deliberative practices and would engage with them should they happen in their country. We draw on individual data from a survey conducted in November 2024 on a national representative sample. We isolate baseline orientations towards deliberation and find that most Moldovans have positive views about deliberation, but many support deliberation strongly without striving to engage. Support for deliberation is influenced by area of residence and gender, while the willingness to engage is the result of people’s attitudes towards politics and decision-making.

Contemporary Politics
Babeș-Bolyai University (RO), University of Glasgow (GB)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Social Capital and Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.