Law and AI in Hiring: Lessons from the EU on Reconceptualizing Risks and Rights

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used to streamline hiring procedures, but it raises concerns about transparency and discrimination. The European Union (EU)’s Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA) is the first broad attempt to regulate AI, using a tiered approach based on levels of risk. This article asks whether and to what extent such an approach can adequately protect job applicants’ fundamental rights. Focusing on the EU as a global reference point, it shows how connecting risk management with rights protection can make regulation more effective. The authors argue that involving affected groups through stakeholder-driven standardization, fundamental rights impact assessments, and co-determination can turn compliance from a box-ticking exercise into meaningful accountability. Placing the AIA within the broader contexts of data protection, equality, and product safety law, the article offers practical lessons for jurisdictions worldwide seeking to align technological innovation with fundamental rights protection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Industrial and Labor Relations Review
Published
2026-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00197939261429875
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Law and AI in Hiring: Lessons from the EU on Reconceptualizing Risks and Rights

Carlotta Rigotti, Antonio Aloisi, Nastazja Potocka-Sionek, Eduard Fosch-Villaronga
Industrial and Labor Relations Review
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Law and AI in Hiring: Lessons from the EU on Reconceptualizing Risks and Rights

Carlotta Rigotti, Antonio Aloisi, Nastazja Potocka-Sionek, Eduard Fosch-Villaronga
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used to streamline hiring procedures, but it raises concerns about transparency and discrimination. The European Union (EU)’s Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA) is the first broad attempt to regulate AI, using a tiered approach based on levels of risk. This article asks whether and to what extent such an approach can adequately protect job applicants’ fundamental rights. Focusing on the EU as a global reference point, it shows how connecting risk management with rights protection can make regulation more effective. The authors argue that involving affected groups through stakeholder-driven standardization, fundamental rights impact assessments, and co-determination can turn compliance from a box-ticking exercise into meaningful accountability. Placing the AIA within the broader contexts of data protection, equality, and product safety law, the article offers practical lessons for jurisdictions worldwide seeking to align technological innovation with fundamental rights protection.

Industrial and Labor Relations Review
Digital Science (United States) (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.