Reconciling canopy light interception and photosynthetic efficiency to optimize source-sink coordination and yield formation in winter wheat

Optimizing the seeding rate is critical for wheat productivity. However, excessive densification often compromises individual photosynthetic efficiency to maximize canopy light interception, creating a trade-off that constrains yield. The physiological mechanisms linking canopy structure, photosynthesis, and source-sink coordination under varying seeding rates remain insufficiently quantified. Based on a two-year field trial assessing four seeding rates, i.e., 22.5 × 10⁵ (D15), 30.0 × 10⁵ (D20), 37.5 × 10⁵ (D25), and 45.0 × 10⁵ (D30) plants ha⁻¹, this study evaluated how seeding rate regulates leaf photosynthetic performance, canopy architecture, dry matter accumulation and yield formation in winter wheat. Compared to D15, the D20 treatment maintained photosynthetic integrity. D25 and D30 triggered severe non-stomatal limitations, characterized by a 14.1%–28.1% decrease in net photosynthetic rate and a 10.4%–25.0% increase in intercellular CO2 concentration. This physiological decline negated the structural benefits of maximized light interception. Mechanistically, D20 optimized the source-sink relationship by promoting post-flowering dry matter accumulation, significantly increasing the number of spikes by 35.2%, thereby enhancing the yield by 30%. Crucially, it avoided the resource-dilution penalties typical of high seeding rates. Partial Least Squares Path Modeling confirmed that seeding rate regulates yield by reconciling the trade-off between population expansion and metabolic competence. Machine learning simulation further refined the optimal seeding rate to 30.7 × 10⁵ plants ha⁻¹, defining a high-yield stability window (26.4–35.1 × 10⁵ plants ha⁻¹) characterized by specific physiological indicators (LAI 4.6–5.3, upper IPAR 68%–73%, Pn 22.2–25.5 µmol m⁻² s⁻¹). Optimizing the seeding rate successfully reconciles the trade-off between canopy light capture and photosynthetic efficiency. By maintaining metabolic integrity while expanding population structure, the optimal seeding rate coordinates source-sink relationships to maximize yield. This study provides a mechanistic framework and quantitative physiological thresholds for precision management. Future applications should account for genotype-by-environment (G×E) interactions to refine these parameters across diverse wheat production systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Plant Biology
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-026-08618-3
Primary Topic
Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reconciling canopy light interception and photosynthetic efficiency to optimize source-sink coordination and yield formation in winter wheat

Gao Lin, Yujian Yang, Yulei Zhu, Youhong Song et al.
BMC Plant Biology
Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
article

Reconciling canopy light interception and photosynthetic efficiency to optimize source-sink coordination and yield formation in winter wheat

Gao Lin, Yujian Yang, Yulei Zhu, Youhong Song, Hui Su, Yamiao Zhang, Shi Yang, Jinpeng Li
article en

Abstract

Optimizing the seeding rate is critical for wheat productivity. However, excessive densification often compromises individual photosynthetic efficiency to maximize canopy light interception, creating a trade-off that constrains yield. The physiological mechanisms linking canopy structure, photosynthesis, and source-sink coordination under varying seeding rates remain insufficiently quantified. Based on a two-year field trial assessing four seeding rates, i.e., 22.5 × 10⁵ (D15), 30.0 × 10⁵ (D20), 37.5 × 10⁵ (D25), and 45.0 × 10⁵ (D30) plants ha⁻¹, this study evaluated how seeding rate regulates leaf photosynthetic performance, canopy architecture, dry matter accumulation and yield formation in winter wheat. Compared to D15, the D20 treatment maintained photosynthetic integrity. D25 and D30 triggered severe non-stomatal limitations, characterized by a 14.1%–28.1% decrease in net photosynthetic rate and a 10.4%–25.0% increase in intercellular CO2 concentration. This physiological decline negated the structural benefits of maximized light interception. Mechanistically, D20 optimized the source-sink relationship by promoting post-flowering dry matter accumulation, significantly increasing the number of spikes by 35.2%, thereby enhancing the yield by 30%. Crucially, it avoided the resource-dilution penalties typical of high seeding rates. Partial Least Squares Path Modeling confirmed that seeding rate regulates yield by reconciling the trade-off between population expansion and metabolic competence. Machine learning simulation further refined the optimal seeding rate to 30.7 × 10⁵ plants ha⁻¹, defining a high-yield stability window (26.4–35.1 × 10⁵ plants ha⁻¹) characterized by specific physiological indicators (LAI 4.6–5.3, upper IPAR 68%–73%, Pn 22.2–25.5 µmol m⁻² s⁻¹). Optimizing the seeding rate successfully reconciles the trade-off between canopy light capture and photosynthetic efficiency. By maintaining metabolic integrity while expanding population structure, the optimal seeding rate coordinates source-sink relationships to maximize yield. This study provides a mechanistic framework and quantitative physiological thresholds for precision management. Future applications should account for genotype-by-environment (G×E) interactions to refine these parameters across diverse wheat production systems.

BMC Plant Biology
Anhui Agricultural University (CN), The University of Queensland (AU), ARC Centre of Excellence for Plant Success in Nature and Agriculture (AU), Jiangxi Agricultural University (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.