THE MODAL DISCIPLINE OF BIPOLAR SYMMETRY: a critical–propositional analysis of A Cyclic 4D Bipolar Universe (v10), by Mark Stuart Hutchison, in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity

This article presents a critical–propositional examination of Mark Stuart Hutchison’s A Cyclic 4D Bipolar Universe (v10) in confrontation with Vidamor Cabannas’s Theory of Objectivity (TO). The study investigates Hutchison’s proposal of an eternal, cyclic, four-dimensional bipolar universe and evaluates its conceptual scope, ontological consistency, and possible scientific relevance in light of the modal and cosmogonic framework of TO. The paper argues that Hutchison’s model has significant heuristic value. It rejects the sufficiency of the Big Bang as an ultimate explanation, proposes a broader symmetry between collapse and expansion, and seeks to unify gravity, dark matter, dark energy, and cosmic evolution within a single geometric architecture. These features make the model an important interlocutor in contemporary cosmological debate. At the same time, the article shows that, under the modal discipline of the Theory of Objectivity, the bipolar model remains ontologically insufficient. It does not begin from Nothingness as a primitive and eternal mathematical essence, does not adequately incorporate infinity as the necessary non-element of logical definition, does not fully articulate constitutive observation, and does not explicitly integrate the substance transcendent to the quantum. In the objectivist reading adopted here, that transcendent substance is understood as knowledge or information produced in atomic relations and equivalent to atomic radiations. The article therefore proposes a balanced conclusion: Hutchison’s framework should not be dismissed, since it contains relevant geometric and cosmological intuitions; however, it should be interpreted as a partial and phenomenic cosmology rather than as a complete deductive ontology. From the perspective of TO, its most fruitful role lies in serving as a dialogical and subordinate framework that may illuminate certain phenomenic regimes while remaining subject to the stronger modal requirements of objectivist ontology. The paper also includes an appendix in TO style, offering an objectivist reinterpretation of Hutchison’s 4D bipolar symmetry in phenomenological and cosmogonic terms. Keywords Theory of Objectivity; modal ontology; cosmology; cyclic universe; 4D bipolar universe; Mark Stuart Hutchison; Big Bang critique; gravity; dark matter; dark energy; phenomenic analysis; cosmogony; Zenodo; critical–propositional analysis; AI-assisted research