Is health a basic human right or a commodity? Travelling the difficult road towards equity of outcomes

From 1938, Aotearoa New Zealand health policy committed to providing free universal access to secondary healthcare. This approach initially worked for all citizens except Māori and Pacific peoples, who had different unmet needs. From the 1980s, as a neoliberal agenda spread, it became clear that action was needed to protect the population from the scourge of health as a commodity. Those who could afford to buy healthcare already had better social determinants of health; however, ultimately inadequate legal processes failed to protect many people from the damage to our healthcare systems. The focus should have been on the ultimate goal of universal equity of health outcomes. To rebalance, we define health as a collective and individual legal right. The required laws to thus refresh the social contract should: i) bind rights and responsibilities of government and governed and protect all citizens; and ii) be enshrined against future whims of politicians. We suggest ways forward, including: i) open physician advocacy, starting with the medical colleges; ii) honouring the right of New Zealanders, individually and collectively, to health; iii) adhering to relevant international agreements and national laws; and iv) advancing a codified constitutional legal structure for Aotearoa New Zealand.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Zealand Medical Journal
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26635/6965.7355
Primary Topic
New Zealand Economic and Social Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is health a basic human right or a commodity? Travelling the difficult road towards equity of outcomes

John D. Potter, Fiona McDonald, Phil Bagshaw, Sue Bagshaw et al.
New Zealand Medical Journal
New Zealand Economic and Social Studies
article

Is health a basic human right or a commodity? Travelling the difficult road towards equity of outcomes

John D. Potter, Fiona McDonald, Phil Bagshaw, Sue Bagshaw, Ganesh R Ahirao, Matt Roskruge, John Goddard
article en

Abstract

From 1938, Aotearoa New Zealand health policy committed to providing free universal access to secondary healthcare. This approach initially worked for all citizens except Māori and Pacific peoples, who had different unmet needs. From the 1980s, as a neoliberal agenda spread, it became clear that action was needed to protect the population from the scourge of health as a commodity. Those who could afford to buy healthcare already had better social determinants of health; however, ultimately inadequate legal processes failed to protect many people from the damage to our healthcare systems. The focus should have been on the ultimate goal of universal equity of health outcomes. To rebalance, we define health as a collective and individual legal right. The required laws to thus refresh the social contract should: i) bind rights and responsibilities of government and governed and protect all citizens; and ii) be enshrined against future whims of politicians. We suggest ways forward, including: i) open physician advocacy, starting with the medical colleges; ii) honouring the right of New Zealanders, individually and collectively, to health; iii) adhering to relevant international agreements and national laws; and iv) advancing a codified constitutional legal structure for Aotearoa New Zealand.

New Zealand Medical JournalVol. 139(1632)
Environment Canterbury (NZ), Victoria University of Wellington (NZ), Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US), Safety Management Systems Aotearoa (New Zealand) (NZ), Massey University (NZ), University of Otago (NZ)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
New Zealand Economic and Social Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.