China and international economic dispute settlement: disaggregating the state

Abstract Most studies take a unitary state-centric approach to assessing China’s relationship with international economic law. In contrast, we provide a more nuanced approach that assesses variation in China’s engagement. We examine the role of different Chinese state and non-state actors, considering their interests, ideological frames, institutional contexts, and relation to state power. We illustrate our analytic framework by examining China’s response to and engagement with international dispute settlement systems in three areas: international commercial arbitration, international trade dispute settlement, and investor–state arbitration. Our approach is important for global cooperation in discrete policy areas so that the West does not ‘other’ China in simplistic, binary terms.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International Economic Law
Published
2026-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgag003
Primary Topic
International Arbitration and Investment Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

China and international economic dispute settlement: disaggregating the state

Henry Gao, Ji Li, Gregory Shaffer
Journal of International Economic Law
International Arbitration and Investment Law
article

China and international economic dispute settlement: disaggregating the state

Henry Gao, Ji Li, Gregory Shaffer
article en

Abstract

Abstract Most studies take a unitary state-centric approach to assessing China’s relationship with international economic law. In contrast, we provide a more nuanced approach that assesses variation in China’s engagement. We examine the role of different Chinese state and non-state actors, considering their interests, ideological frames, institutional contexts, and relation to state power. We illustrate our analytic framework by examining China’s response to and engagement with international dispute settlement systems in three areas: international commercial arbitration, international trade dispute settlement, and investor–state arbitration. Our approach is important for global cooperation in discrete policy areas so that the West does not ‘other’ China in simplistic, binary terms.

Journal of International Economic Law
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
International Arbitration and Investment Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

China and international economic dispute settlement: disaggregating the state — Henry Gao, Ji Li, et al. · Journal of International Economic Law (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS