Unbiased data-driven analysis of five amyloid-beta peptides for biomarker investigations in familial Alzheimer’s disease

Abstract Changes to the relative abundance of amyloid-beta (Aβ) peptides are hallmarks of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived neurons offer a physiological model of Aβ production. We employed unbiased, data-driven analyses to investigate combinations of Aβ peptides as AD biomarkers and the relative contribution of peptides to AD pathogenesis. We measured Aβ37, Aβ38, Aβ40, Aβ42 and Aβ43 in ten iPSC-neuronal cultures from PSEN1 mutation carriers. We combined these data with published cell model data and used linear weighted combinations to 1) distinguish AD from controls, and 2) predict age-at-onset for PSEN1 mutations. Data-driven approaches distinguished Aβ42 and Aβ43 from shorter peptides, providing unbiased evidence for a greater association of Aβ42 and Aβ43 to disease pathogenesis, compared with shorter peptides (Aβ37, Aβ38 and Aβ40). Weighted linear combinations of Aβ peptides outperform Aβ42/40 and provide insights into relative peptide contribution as biomarkers. A representative weighted composite value ratio (wCVR) derived from all data, balancing both disease classification and age-at-onset prediction, was (21 Aβ37 + 10 Aβ38 + 69 Aβ40)/(94 Aβ42 + 6 Aβ43). This work suggests a practical non-parametric harmonisation approach to employing Aβ ratios as biomarkers for AD, from multiple sites and assays. Building on this foundation, we applied a new model using weighted composite value ratios, which outperform existing biomarkers across all tasks. This underscores the value of integrating multiple peptides, and assigning optimised weightings. The study confirms the association of Aβ42 and Aβ43 with AD pathogenesis in a data-driven manner. Peptide weights further provide mechanistic insights into the relative contribution of each peptide to disease, such as a greater contribution of Aβ37 compared to Aβ38. The algorithm used herein can be further refined to improve biomarkers for AD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brain Communications
Published
2026-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcag105
Primary Topic
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unbiased data-driven analysis of five amyloid-beta peptides for biomarker investigations in familial Alzheimer’s disease

Teisha Y. Bradshaw, Claire A. Leckey, Christopher R S Belder, Isaac Llorente Saguer et al.
Brain Communications
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
article

Unbiased data-driven analysis of five amyloid-beta peptides for biomarker investigations in familial Alzheimer’s disease

Teisha Y. Bradshaw, Claire A. Leckey, Christopher R S Belder, Isaac Llorente Saguer, Rebecca Gabriele, Selina Wray, Charles Arber, Lucía Chávez-Gutiérrez, Rohan de Silva, Nick C Fox, Neil P Oxtoby
article en

Abstract

Abstract Changes to the relative abundance of amyloid-beta (Aβ) peptides are hallmarks of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived neurons offer a physiological model of Aβ production. We employed unbiased, data-driven analyses to investigate combinations of Aβ peptides as AD biomarkers and the relative contribution of peptides to AD pathogenesis. We measured Aβ37, Aβ38, Aβ40, Aβ42 and Aβ43 in ten iPSC-neuronal cultures from PSEN1 mutation carriers. We combined these data with published cell model data and used linear weighted combinations to 1) distinguish AD from controls, and 2) predict age-at-onset for PSEN1 mutations. Data-driven approaches distinguished Aβ42 and Aβ43 from shorter peptides, providing unbiased evidence for a greater association of Aβ42 and Aβ43 to disease pathogenesis, compared with shorter peptides (Aβ37, Aβ38 and Aβ40). Weighted linear combinations of Aβ peptides outperform Aβ42/40 and provide insights into relative peptide contribution as biomarkers. A representative weighted composite value ratio (wCVR) derived from all data, balancing both disease classification and age-at-onset prediction, was (21 Aβ37 + 10 Aβ38 + 69 Aβ40)/(94 Aβ42 + 6 Aβ43). This work suggests a practical non-parametric harmonisation approach to employing Aβ ratios as biomarkers for AD, from multiple sites and assays. Building on this foundation, we applied a new model using weighted composite value ratios, which outperform existing biomarkers across all tasks. This underscores the value of integrating multiple peptides, and assigning optimised weightings. The study confirms the association of Aβ42 and Aβ43 with AD pathogenesis in a data-driven manner. Peptide weights further provide mechanistic insights into the relative contribution of each peptide to disease, such as a greater contribution of Aβ37 compared to Aβ38. The algorithm used herein can be further refined to improve biomarkers for AD.

Brain Communications
Allen Institute for Brain Science (US), Royal Adelaide Hospital (AU), Energy Institute (GB), Great Ormond Street Hospital (GB), Queen Elizabeth Hospital (AU), UK Dementia Research Institute (GB), Institute of Ophthalmology (MX), MRC Prion Unit (GB), UCL Biomedical Research Centre (GB), NIHR Queen Square Dementia Biomedical Research Unit (GB), VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain & Disease Research (BE), University College London (GB), The University of Adelaide (AU), KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.