Numerical Simulation of Steady and Pulsatile Flows Around Vascular Closure Devices: Implications for Thrombosis
The results suggest that anchor-based devices, resulted in larger flow disturbances, decreasing TAWSS and increasing OSI in their wake, compared with suture-based devices. Such conditions are likely to be pro-thrombotic. While the choice of VCD may be multifactorial, the present study offers new comparative data on their hemodynamic impact.Clinical ImpactThe results from the present study offer unique comparative data on the hemodynamic impact of 4 vascular closure devices. These findings may help in the selection of devices. The pro-thrombotic nature of anchor-based devices may make these less suitable for certain clinical scenarios where there is a high risk of thrombosis and vessel occlusion.
Authors
- Lisa Prahl Wittberg (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9976-8316)
- Louis P. Parker (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5409-8280)
- Lars Mikael Broman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4124-4581)
- Alireza Daryapeyma (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1730-9077)
- Massimiliano Colarieti Tosti
- Estelle Rozet
- Fanny Beltran
Institutions
- Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
- École Polytechnique (FR)
- École Nationale Supérieure de Techniques Avancées (FR)
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Endovascular Therapy
- Published
- 2026-03-22
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028261424744
- Primary Topic
- Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00