Numerical Simulation of Steady and Pulsatile Flows Around Vascular Closure Devices: Implications for Thrombosis

The results suggest that anchor-based devices, resulted in larger flow disturbances, decreasing TAWSS and increasing OSI in their wake, compared with suture-based devices. Such conditions are likely to be pro-thrombotic. While the choice of VCD may be multifactorial, the present study offers new comparative data on their hemodynamic impact.Clinical ImpactThe results from the present study offer unique comparative data on the hemodynamic impact of 4 vascular closure devices. These findings may help in the selection of devices. The pro-thrombotic nature of anchor-based devices may make these less suitable for certain clinical scenarios where there is a high risk of thrombosis and vessel occlusion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Endovascular Therapy
Published
2026-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028261424744
Primary Topic
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Numerical Simulation of Steady and Pulsatile Flows Around Vascular Closure Devices: Implications for Thrombosis

Lisa Prahl Wittberg, Louis P. Parker, Lars Mikael Broman, Alireza Daryapeyma et al.
Journal of Endovascular Therapy
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
article

Numerical Simulation of Steady and Pulsatile Flows Around Vascular Closure Devices: Implications for Thrombosis

Lisa Prahl Wittberg, Louis P. Parker, Lars Mikael Broman, Alireza Daryapeyma, Massimiliano Colarieti Tosti, Estelle Rozet, Fanny Beltran
article en

Abstract

The results suggest that anchor-based devices, resulted in larger flow disturbances, decreasing TAWSS and increasing OSI in their wake, compared with suture-based devices. Such conditions are likely to be pro-thrombotic. While the choice of VCD may be multifactorial, the present study offers new comparative data on their hemodynamic impact.Clinical ImpactThe results from the present study offer unique comparative data on the hemodynamic impact of 4 vascular closure devices. These findings may help in the selection of devices. The pro-thrombotic nature of anchor-based devices may make these less suitable for certain clinical scenarios where there is a high risk of thrombosis and vessel occlusion.

Journal of Endovascular Therapy
Karolinska University Hospital (SE), École Polytechnique (FR), École Nationale Supérieure de Techniques Avancées (FR), Karolinska Institutet (SE), KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.