When Does Attention Collapse? A Typology and Temporal Model of Inattentive Responding in Web Surveys

I examined behavioral changes in web surveys, focusing on shifts in attentiveness over time. Using response-time Gaussian mixture modeling, respondents were classified into three types: consistently inattentive, deteriorating (initially attentive but later disengaged), and consistently attentive. For the deteriorating group, a Weibull model estimated the timing of lapses relative to cumulative time, revealing a sharp decline in attentiveness at seven–nine minutes. These findings challenge static views of inattentiveness as a fixed trait and support a dynamic framework of attentional decline during survey participation. By quantifying when and how inattention occurs, this approach provides insights into inattentive responding patterns and supports real-time monitoring and adaptive design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Field Methods
Published
2026-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x261431542
Primary Topic
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When Does Attention Collapse? A Typology and Temporal Model of Inattentive Responding in Web Surveys

Yoshihisa Kaneko
Field Methods
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
article

When Does Attention Collapse? A Typology and Temporal Model of Inattentive Responding in Web Surveys

Yoshihisa Kaneko
article en

Abstract

I examined behavioral changes in web surveys, focusing on shifts in attentiveness over time. Using response-time Gaussian mixture modeling, respondents were classified into three types: consistently inattentive, deteriorating (initially attentive but later disengaged), and consistently attentive. For the deteriorating group, a Weibull model estimated the timing of lapses relative to cumulative time, revealing a sharp decline in attentiveness at seven–nine minutes. These findings challenge static views of inattentiveness as a fixed trait and support a dynamic framework of attentional decline during survey participation. By quantifying when and how inattention occurs, this approach provides insights into inattentive responding patterns and supports real-time monitoring and adaptive design.

Field Methods
Yamagata University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

When Does Attention Collapse? A Typology and Temporal Model of Inattentive Responding in Web Surveys — Yoshihisa Kaneko · Field Methods (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS