Multidimensional Governance and Sustainable Development in <scp>E7</scp> Economies: A Quantile‐Based Comparative Framework

ABSTRACT Achieving sustainable development in emerging economies depends critically on governance systems that shape policy implementation, institutional accountability, and development stability. Yet evidence remains limited on whether governance reforms generate uniform sustainability gains across different levels of development performance. This study examines the heterogeneous effects of economic, political, institutional, and general governance on sustainable development in the E7 economies (Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Russia, and Turkey) over 2000–2022. Using the Method of Moments Quantile Regression framework, supported by second‐generation panel diagnostics to accommodate cross‐sectional dependence and slope heterogeneity, the results reveal strong quantile‐dependent behaviour in the governance–sustainability nexus. Economic governance exhibits consistently positive and increasing effects across the sustainable development goals index distribution, indicating robust sustainability dividends from regulatory quality and macroeconomic management. Political governance exerts larger impacts in mid‐ and high‐performing economies, highlighting the role of accountability and civic participation once baseline governance capacity is established. Institutional governance shows weaker and more volatile effects, implying threshold‐driven gains in which rule of law and corruption control matter more after institutional deepening. The study contributes by clarifying how governance pillars operate differently across sustainability‐performance levels, thereby strengthening the evidence base for governance sequencing in large emerging economies. Robustness checks with lag structures, common‐shock controls, and dynamic specifications confirm these patterns, although causal interpretation remains subject to endogeneity concerns. Policy implications are direct: strengthening administrative capacity, political stability, and institutional integrity can accelerate SDG progress, particularly for SDG 16–linked outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Development
Published
2026-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70933
Primary Topic
Corruption and Economic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multidimensional Governance and Sustainable Development in E7 Economies: A Quantile‐Based Comparative Framework

Jing Lan, Ideraoluwa Nimat Ajide, Yan Guo
Sustainable Development
Corruption and Economic Development
article

Multidimensional Governance and Sustainable Development in E7 Economies: A Quantile‐Based Comparative Framework

Jing Lan, Ideraoluwa Nimat Ajide, Yan Guo
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Achieving sustainable development in emerging economies depends critically on governance systems that shape policy implementation, institutional accountability, and development stability. Yet evidence remains limited on whether governance reforms generate uniform sustainability gains across different levels of development performance. This study examines the heterogeneous effects of economic, political, institutional, and general governance on sustainable development in the E7 economies (Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Russia, and Turkey) over 2000–2022. Using the Method of Moments Quantile Regression framework, supported by second‐generation panel diagnostics to accommodate cross‐sectional dependence and slope heterogeneity, the results reveal strong quantile‐dependent behaviour in the governance–sustainability nexus. Economic governance exhibits consistently positive and increasing effects across the sustainable development goals index distribution, indicating robust sustainability dividends from regulatory quality and macroeconomic management. Political governance exerts larger impacts in mid‐ and high‐performing economies, highlighting the role of accountability and civic participation once baseline governance capacity is established. Institutional governance shows weaker and more volatile effects, implying threshold‐driven gains in which rule of law and corruption control matter more after institutional deepening. The study contributes by clarifying how governance pillars operate differently across sustainability‐performance levels, thereby strengthening the evidence base for governance sequencing in large emerging economies. Robustness checks with lag structures, common‐shock controls, and dynamic specifications confirm these patterns, although causal interpretation remains subject to endogeneity concerns. Policy implications are direct: strengthening administrative capacity, political stability, and institutional integrity can accelerate SDG progress, particularly for SDG 16–linked outcomes.

Sustainable Development
The University of Sydney (AU), Qujing Normal University (CN), Pan-Atlantic University (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Corruption and Economic Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.